In my view, large-scale market participants playing millions worth of volume aren't necessarily problematic—they're essentially building liquidity and expanding the overall market ecosystem as token supplies grow and price levels adjust upward. It's comparable to how major capital allocation drives economic expansion. The real issue lies elsewhere: those engaging in minimal sub-100k transactions with manipulative intent. The distinction matters when assessing actual value creation versus speculation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlwaysMissingTops
· 10h ago
Damn, are you whitewashing the whales again? Small-scale manipulation is the real cancer.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 14h ago
Hmm... so basically, big players building liquidity is no problem, but small investors causing trouble are the real tumors? That logic is a bit absurd.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlady
· 23h ago
Hmm... this logic doesn't quite hold up. Is it called building liquidity for millions, and manipulation for small amounts? How is it distinguished?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-06 18:54
You're right, large traders boosting volume to build liquidity are indeed market making. Small traders with less than 100,000 are truly annoying, just thinking about harvesting profits.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 01-06 18:51
Here comes another attempt to whitewash the whales; I'm tired of this explanation.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFear
· 01-06 18:49
Hi, I don't quite understand this logic... Big players throwing millions to build liquidity, while small investors playing with tens of thousands to manipulate? Feels a bit double standard haha
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 01-06 18:43
Retail manipulation is more disgusting than whales building liquidity, and that's right.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 01-06 18:31
Hmm... this logic doesn't quite hold up. Large investors throwing tens of millions to build the ecosystem, while small investors playing with 100,000 is considered manipulation? Sounds a bit double standard.
In my view, large-scale market participants playing millions worth of volume aren't necessarily problematic—they're essentially building liquidity and expanding the overall market ecosystem as token supplies grow and price levels adjust upward. It's comparable to how major capital allocation drives economic expansion. The real issue lies elsewhere: those engaging in minimal sub-100k transactions with manipulative intent. The distinction matters when assessing actual value creation versus speculation.