Recently, many people have been excited about the actions of the Federal Reserve. The Fed plans to buy $8.165 billion in short-term government bonds, and many are already calculating which cryptocurrencies to add to their positions. But here’s a cold splash of water—this move is not the kind of market bullishness you might think, and getting the direction wrong could likely lead to losses.
What is the essence of this operation? Simply put, it’s "technical liquidity management." Many habitually confuse it with QE (quantitative easing), but these are two completely different things. The former is like giving the market a fever reducer, while the latter is like pouring chicken soup to boost health. How big is the difference? Let’s look at two core points.
First, the purpose. This purchase of short-term government bonds aims to stabilize short-term interest rates and prevent abnormal fluctuations in the money market—like patching a leaking water pipe at home to prevent flooding. In contrast, QE is when the central bank injects large amounts of liquidity to rescue the economy during a slowdown, with completely different intensity and intent.
Second, the impact on the crypto market. Large-scale liquidity injections like QE tend to cause funds to flow everywhere, easily fueling our highly volatile market. But this kind of technical operation is different; the capital flow is "targeted stabilization," and it’s unlikely to flow into the crypto market. At most, it might help soothe market sentiment somewhat, but the actual catalytic effect remains limited.
So, instead of rushing to increase positions based on this news, it’s better to clarify the logic first. My seven years in this space have taught me that the easiest trap to fall into is confusing concepts—mistaking stabilization operations for stimulative policies.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketBuilder
· 11h ago
Another wave of newbies is about to be harvested. This time, it's definitely not QE, brothers.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 15h ago
Another bunch of people rush to add positions impulsively. Seriously, there are so many who confuse QE with patching leaks that I can't even count.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 20h ago
Another batch driven by news hype, are they really treating QE as a trading tool?
View OriginalReply0
BagHolderTillRetire
· 01-06 18:50
It's the same old story, every time someone gets scammed into adding more positions, it's truly unbelievable.
Honestly, this is just a stopgap measure; how can anyone see it as good news?
People confusing QE need to go back to school; otherwise, they'll suffer huge losses soon.
It's been 7 years, and the same advice applies: don't follow the crowd blindly, think carefully before acting.
Funds simply can't flow into the crypto space; you're still dreaming?
This round is about maintaining stability, not flooding the market; there's a big difference.
It's 2024, and some people still confuse these two concepts, I really can't believe it.
As long as short-term interest rates stabilize, that's all there is to it, and it has nothing to do with us.
Here comes someone about to suffer losses again, it happens every time.
Confusing concepts is the biggest trap in this circle; once again, someone is about to fall into it.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 01-06 18:47
Another wave of people are going to get cut, really, QE and this kind of leak filling are not even in the same category.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 01-06 18:37
You're getting overly excited again. Those who confuse QE with leak fixing should reflect on themselves.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofster
· 01-06 18:28
honestly this is exactly the kind of conceptual confusion that gets people liquidated. tbh most traders don't even bother understanding the mechanical difference between technical ops and actual stimulus... they just see fed buying anything and yolo into whatever shitcoin's pumping that day lol
Recently, many people have been excited about the actions of the Federal Reserve. The Fed plans to buy $8.165 billion in short-term government bonds, and many are already calculating which cryptocurrencies to add to their positions. But here’s a cold splash of water—this move is not the kind of market bullishness you might think, and getting the direction wrong could likely lead to losses.
What is the essence of this operation? Simply put, it’s "technical liquidity management." Many habitually confuse it with QE (quantitative easing), but these are two completely different things. The former is like giving the market a fever reducer, while the latter is like pouring chicken soup to boost health. How big is the difference? Let’s look at two core points.
First, the purpose. This purchase of short-term government bonds aims to stabilize short-term interest rates and prevent abnormal fluctuations in the money market—like patching a leaking water pipe at home to prevent flooding. In contrast, QE is when the central bank injects large amounts of liquidity to rescue the economy during a slowdown, with completely different intensity and intent.
Second, the impact on the crypto market. Large-scale liquidity injections like QE tend to cause funds to flow everywhere, easily fueling our highly volatile market. But this kind of technical operation is different; the capital flow is "targeted stabilization," and it’s unlikely to flow into the crypto market. At most, it might help soothe market sentiment somewhat, but the actual catalytic effect remains limited.
So, instead of rushing to increase positions based on this news, it’s better to clarify the logic first. My seven years in this space have taught me that the easiest trap to fall into is confusing concepts—mistaking stabilization operations for stimulative policies.