Stablecoin wealth management is something many people only know as "dead savings," but the approach can actually be more flexible.



Taking a PSM pool from a leading stablecoin protocol as an example, the annualized return for swapping USDT and isUSD remains stable between 7% and 12%. The key is that there’s no lock-up; you can deposit and withdraw at will. But this is not the end—by adding leverage through borrowing, returns can be boosted to another level.

Let's do some quick math with $1,000 USDT: depositing into the PSM pool yields a guaranteed annual profit of $70-$120, while using that $1,000 as collateral to borrow $700 stablecoins at a low interest rate of 2%. The $700 is then invested in an 18% annualized financial product on a platform, earning another $126. After deducting $14 in borrowing interest, the total annual profit is about $270, which translates to an annualized return of 28.2%.

Even better, the original $1,000 USDT can be redeemed at any time without affecting liquidity. The entire strategy is: arbitrage the spread + collateralized borrowing + reinvestment for amplification, layered on top of each other.

On the technical side, the PSM pool maintains the peg between isUSD and USDT automatically through smart contracts, with intelligent scheduling to ensure no liquidation risk. Paired with low-interest borrowing tools, this basically balances returns and safety. Of course, the premise is to choose a reliable protocol—just avoid getting scammed.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PortfolioAlertvip
· 01-08 23:47
28% annualized yield sounds attractive, but leverage is really something to be careful with. One misstep and you'll be liquidated.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 01-08 10:59
28% annualized? Sounds good, but the actual operational risks stack up. You need to be very careful.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurkervip
· 01-07 08:26
28% annualized? Sounds good, but this combination of strategies carries accumulated risks, and adding leverage easily leads to a crash.
View OriginalReply0
rug_connoisseurvip
· 01-06 17:55
28% annualized? That number seems a bit shaky, feels like something's about to blow up.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatientvip
· 01-06 17:50
Wait, 28% annualized? Come on, this number is too much. If something really happens, who will compensate?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 01-06 17:50
28% annualized? Sounds good, but I keep feeling like something's off...
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemistvip
· 01-06 17:42
28% annualized? Sounds not that simple...
View OriginalReply0
FromMinerToFarmervip
· 01-06 17:41
Wait, 28% annualized? That sounds a bit risky. Are these lending interests really reliable?
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuyvip
· 01-06 17:31
28% annualized? That's pretty aggressive, but it feels like the risk is a bit high.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)