2026-01-06 14:30:26

When investment growth rates significantly outpace GDP expansion, the investment gap closes rapidly. However, once that gap narrows to zero, maintaining such aggressive investment growth becomes counterproductive. At that point, a more balanced approach emerges as the optimal strategy—letting investment align with the natural trajectory of domestic demand. This shift reflects a fundamental economic principle: extraordinary growth rates serve a specific purpose during deficit periods, but they become inefficient once the underlying imbalance is resolved.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeNightmare

· 15h ago

In simple terms, over-investment ultimately leads to waste; you need to find a balance point.

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 01-08 14:11

In plain terms, over-investment can't solve poverty.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 01-06 15:00

Basically, over-investing ultimately ends up hurting yourself. Balance is the most important thing.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMaster

· 01-06 14:55

In simple terms, over-investing in this strategy has a time window; you can't be aggressive all the time. You need to adjust your strategy based on market conditions. It's the same principle as timing your crypto trading correctly.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-0717ab66

· 01-06 14:41

That's right, over-investment is just throwing money away. It's ridiculous that investment growth can't keep up with GDP growth... Balance is the key; being overly aggressive is suicidal. This logic makes sense—filling holes aggressively in the early stages, then stabilizing later. It feels a bit like the story of Mr. Dong Guo; excessive support can actually harm people. Once the gap is filled, you need to hit the brakes; otherwise, bubbles will form. In plain terms, it's about not going to extremes. This analysis is truly rational, unlike some economists who see things in black and white.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 01-06 14:39

In plain terms, it's over-investing and ultimately backfiring on oneself.

View OriginalReply0