Over that stretch, debt climbed steeply. The key difference? Most of it went straight into productive investments. When those investments actually paid off and drove real economic output, the debt spike didn't automatically crush the debt-to-GDP ratio. That's the critical part—debt growth doesn't doom you if the money flows into things that generate returns. It's why the ratio stayed manageable despite rapid borrowing.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemeCurator
· 01-09 13:34
Wow, this is the key... money must be spent wisely.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 01-09 13:12
Well, that's the key—borrowing money isn't a big deal; it's where the money is spent that matters.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropworkerZhang
· 01-08 03:04
That's why you need to see where the money is spent. Debt itself is not a problem; spending on what matters is the key to profit.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 01-06 14:54
Productive investment is the key; where the money flows truly determines everything.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapist
· 01-06 14:51
The key is that money must truly create value; otherwise, debt leverage will eventually blow up.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 01-06 14:50
The key is where the debt is used; productive investment is the lifeline.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 01-06 14:44
Debt is only a problem if used in the wrong way; it's completely different from a gambler borrowing money and reckless spending.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTrader
· 01-06 14:31
The key is where the money went; output determines everything. This is what it truly means to understand economics.
Over that stretch, debt climbed steeply. The key difference? Most of it went straight into productive investments. When those investments actually paid off and drove real economic output, the debt spike didn't automatically crush the debt-to-GDP ratio. That's the critical part—debt growth doesn't doom you if the money flows into things that generate returns. It's why the ratio stayed manageable despite rapid borrowing.