AI is indeed awkward in crypto trading and analysis scenarios. Using AI to execute trades directly raises questions about stability; relying on AI for chip analysis is less accurate than professional rule-based algorithms; AI summarization and narration are useful, but it’s hard to balance speed and accuracy; as for AI recommendation signals, most of the time they are just talk, unless the underlying system is actually a fixed rule algorithm wrapped in an AI shell.
To put it simply, AI's performance in this area is so-so—useful but not professional enough, saves time but prone to failures. How does everyone handle this issue? Have you found what AI can really do?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WagmiAnon
· 01-08 12:57
To be honest, I stopped believing in AI signals a long time ago; they're just repackaged versions of the same thing.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 01-06 15:43
That's right, everyone is just bragging about AI now. I've tried a few AI trading bots, and they all ended in heavy losses.
AI signals are really all garbage, unless their underlying algorithms are just traditional models with a different skin.
If you ask me, it's still best to watch the market yourself; AI should just be used as an aid to read news summaries.
These days, AI is also starting to cut leeks, so we're being cut by both AI and humans.
Machine learning in the crypto world is just a joke; it's better to look at the rule-based models of professional analysts.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 01-06 14:54
It's just a shell, the core is still running the same old rules.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 01-06 14:50
To be honest, this AI crypto trading thing is just traditional algorithms in disguise, nothing new.
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 01-06 14:49
That's right, AI trading is indeed a false demand. I'm currently relying on traditional technical analysis and manual operations, which are much more stable than using AI signals.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDetector
· 01-06 14:41
nah, ai signal bots are just fancy rule engines in a trench coat... been saying this since the mt. gox days, nobody listens lol
Reply0
DegenWhisperer
· 01-06 14:40
To be honest, I've given up on the AI trading approach long ago. It's just a rule set with a different skin. Do you really think it can beat the market?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-06 14:34
Yeah, really, AI trading is just a gimmick; in critical moments, you still have to rely on your own rules to be stable.
AI is indeed awkward in crypto trading and analysis scenarios. Using AI to execute trades directly raises questions about stability; relying on AI for chip analysis is less accurate than professional rule-based algorithms; AI summarization and narration are useful, but it’s hard to balance speed and accuracy; as for AI recommendation signals, most of the time they are just talk, unless the underlying system is actually a fixed rule algorithm wrapped in an AI shell.
To put it simply, AI's performance in this area is so-so—useful but not professional enough, saves time but prone to failures. How does everyone handle this issue? Have you found what AI can really do?