Recently closed my RAVE grid position. The price has already jumped out of the 0.31 range, and the large fluctuations up and down caused the grid to be trapped, and the short position was also stopped out.
The reason for exiting early yesterday was mainly because the order book was too thin, and I didn't want to bear the risk of negative fees, plus there was a risk of accumulated orders being wiped out. So I decisively closed part of the contract.
From the operational details, each time I buy with the spot wallet between 0.16 and 0.26, then short at 0.71, place a grid short at 0.66, and finally be forced to exit at 0.33. Although the return didn't meet expectations, the rhythm was basically on point.
Looking back at this series of trades, there are two main considerations: First, the market environment in early December was quite poor, with the minimum precision of contract order books often fluctuating in single digits, and various contracts showing exaggerated trends, so I didn't dare to take too large a position; second, RAVE is quite active in the DEX ecosystem and also participated in the Boost program, which means there might be expectations on spot prices, so risk management still needs to be cautious.
Because of these considerations, I kept the initial position relatively conservative. Although the returns were average, from a risk management perspective, it was still acceptable.
The biggest feeling I have about the grid strategy is that it’s hassle-free. It won't be forced to close just because fees suddenly rise. As long as there is a fundamental expectation to support it, confidence in holding is enough. Later, I also plan to try the grid method on other newer tokens to see if I can find more suitable parameter combinations.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainNewbie
· 01-09 14:15
Thin order books are really the killer; the negative fee model can't be played with.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 01-06 14:52
Negative fee rates are really frustrating; cutting losses promptly is still the smart move.
View OriginalReply0
MoonMathMagic
· 01-06 14:50
订单簿稀薄确实是杀手,负费率砸空的事儿见过太多了
Reply0
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 01-06 14:37
Thin order books are really disgusting, negative fees directly discourage trading
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 01-06 14:36
Thin order books are truly the hidden killer; once you've fallen into the trap of negative fees, you've had enough.
Recently closed my RAVE grid position. The price has already jumped out of the 0.31 range, and the large fluctuations up and down caused the grid to be trapped, and the short position was also stopped out.
The reason for exiting early yesterday was mainly because the order book was too thin, and I didn't want to bear the risk of negative fees, plus there was a risk of accumulated orders being wiped out. So I decisively closed part of the contract.
From the operational details, each time I buy with the spot wallet between 0.16 and 0.26, then short at 0.71, place a grid short at 0.66, and finally be forced to exit at 0.33. Although the return didn't meet expectations, the rhythm was basically on point.
Looking back at this series of trades, there are two main considerations: First, the market environment in early December was quite poor, with the minimum precision of contract order books often fluctuating in single digits, and various contracts showing exaggerated trends, so I didn't dare to take too large a position; second, RAVE is quite active in the DEX ecosystem and also participated in the Boost program, which means there might be expectations on spot prices, so risk management still needs to be cautious.
Because of these considerations, I kept the initial position relatively conservative. Although the returns were average, from a risk management perspective, it was still acceptable.
The biggest feeling I have about the grid strategy is that it’s hassle-free. It won't be forced to close just because fees suddenly rise. As long as there is a fundamental expectation to support it, confidence in holding is enough. Later, I also plan to try the grid method on other newer tokens to see if I can find more suitable parameter combinations.