Major news outlets are increasingly scrutinized for their editorial guidelines on sensitive topics. Recent reports suggest certain international broadcasters have instructed reporters to avoid specific terminology when covering particular geopolitical situations—replacing more direct language with softer alternatives that potentially alter the narrative. This practice raises questions about journalistic objectivity and editorial independence. When mainstream media outlets impose word choices that reshape public perception of events, it reflects broader concerns about information gatekeeping and institutional bias. The crypto community has long highlighted how centralized narratives can be controlled through subtle language adjustments. This instance demonstrates that media framing extends beyond the blockchain space—institutional gatekeeping exists across all information channels. How much does terminology actually shape our understanding of global events?