When comparing blockchain projects, the key metrics that matter are: how centralized is it really? Who actually controls it—a small team or the community? Do users actually hold sovereignty over their assets and governance, or is it just lip service?
These questions separate projects that genuinely embrace decentralization from those just riding the wave. The former respects user autonomy and distributes control. The latter? Corporate interests come first, user rights second. In a space that was built on the principle of user sovereignty, this distinction isn't just philosophical—it's everything.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropF5Bro
· 01-09 05:59
Damn it, it's that same set of decentralization bullshit again. Which project really disperses power? They're all just scams.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMaster
· 01-08 06:46
Honestly, most projects talk about decentralization, but in reality, it's still a group of people calling the shots.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleeper
· 01-07 14:28
In simple terms, it's about who truly practices decentralization and who is just putting on a show. Most projects are just shouting slogans.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtist
· 01-06 15:00
It's the same old decentralization rhetoric. Who wouldn't sound good saying it?
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 01-06 13:49
Basically, it's about who is truly decentralized and who is just talking nonsense. Many projects claim to be decentralized, but in reality, it's still the big players calling the shots.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 01-06 13:48
It sounds like some big projects—talk about decentralization on the surface, but real power still lies in the hands of a few big V influencers. It's laughable.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 01-06 13:46
ngl most projects are just theatre at this point, statistically speaking there's like 0.3% actual decentralization happening anywhere... the math doesn't add up
Reply0
ShibaMillionairen't
· 01-06 13:37
To put it simply, most projects claim to be decentralized, but behind the scenes, it's still a few big players calling the shots. User rights? Haha.
View OriginalReply0
OvertimeSquid
· 01-06 13:27
Most projects are singing the tune of decentralization, but few truly dare to delegate authority.
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 01-06 13:25
Most projects are just talking, truly decentralized ones are few and far between.
When comparing blockchain projects, the key metrics that matter are: how centralized is it really? Who actually controls it—a small team or the community? Do users actually hold sovereignty over their assets and governance, or is it just lip service?
These questions separate projects that genuinely embrace decentralization from those just riding the wave. The former respects user autonomy and distributes control. The latter? Corporate interests come first, user rights second. In a space that was built on the principle of user sovereignty, this distinction isn't just philosophical—it's everything.