Recently, I've been observing the performance of the HYPE project, and it's quite interesting. The team insists that they haven't taken the fundraising route, but instead have made waves in the market—reaching a 24-hour trading volume of over 30 billion USD, which is indeed impressive.
This reflects a phenomenon: in today's market competition, the amount of fundraising is not the only key to victory. Technical robustness, product usability, and community consensus are the true differentiators. Some projects spend a lot of money but fail to deliver results, while others achieve remarkable data metrics by minimizing costs.
Compared to competitors like ASTER, the two sides are taking very different approaches. One opts for light fundraising and focuses on product iteration, while the other may still be exploring the optimal path to commercialization. Regardless, this diversity in market competition is actually quite healthy—it indicates that the crypto market no longer solely values fundraising rounds and institutional backing, but also emphasizes real on-chain data and user recognition.
The takeaway for future entrants is: technology and operational efficiency are indeed becoming new barriers to competition.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainTherapist
· 01-09 01:53
A daily trading volume of 30 billion USD, can you generate this kind of activity without funding? It definitely has some substance.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 01-08 17:35
$30 billion daily trading volume? Damn, that's some serious numbers.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Arbitrageur
· 01-06 12:53
lmao $300B daily volume with zero institutional money? honestly, the math checks out better than most VC-backed shitcoins. if you actually optimize for execution instead of pitch decks, margins speak louder than cap tables. HYPE figured out the arbitrage between hype and actual liquidity—that's just clean product design tbh.
Reply0
SillyWhale
· 01-06 12:52
Over 30 billion in transaction volume is quite impressive, but it depends on whether these are genuine transactions...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationAlert
· 01-06 12:50
$30 billion daily trading volume, really can't hold on anymore... This is true strength speaking.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-06 12:49
300 billion in transaction volume without financing? Now that's real substance.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 01-06 12:48
Is there any issue with this 30 billion transaction volume data? It seems a bit uncertain.
Recently, I've been observing the performance of the HYPE project, and it's quite interesting. The team insists that they haven't taken the fundraising route, but instead have made waves in the market—reaching a 24-hour trading volume of over 30 billion USD, which is indeed impressive.
This reflects a phenomenon: in today's market competition, the amount of fundraising is not the only key to victory. Technical robustness, product usability, and community consensus are the true differentiators. Some projects spend a lot of money but fail to deliver results, while others achieve remarkable data metrics by minimizing costs.
Compared to competitors like ASTER, the two sides are taking very different approaches. One opts for light fundraising and focuses on product iteration, while the other may still be exploring the optimal path to commercialization. Regardless, this diversity in market competition is actually quite healthy—it indicates that the crypto market no longer solely values fundraising rounds and institutional backing, but also emphasizes real on-chain data and user recognition.
The takeaway for future entrants is: technology and operational efficiency are indeed becoming new barriers to competition.