Most layer-one blockchains face the same dilemma when integrating real-world assets: either sacrifice decentralization for throughput or maintain decentralization but be unable to handle RWA traffic.



One idea worth considering is to directly use the ETF ecosystem as the underlying design, allowing real-world assets, stablecoins, and crypto assets to coexist natively on the same chain. The benefits of this approach are obvious: institutional portfolios gain the flexibility of DeFi without having to choose between compliance and returns.

From a technical perspective, this architectural design opens up new possibilities for institutional-level asset management.
RWA-1,4%
DEFI3,19%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SelfCustodyBrovip
· 01-09 04:27
This idea sounds good, but can it really be implemented? Do the institutions genuinely want DeFi flexibility or are they just looking to arbitrage?
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 01-07 18:24
I've seen this trick several times before. It sounds good, but actually implementing it is another matter. If institutions really want to come in, they still have to solve the compliance issue, no matter how elegant the architecture is. Wait, is this another attempt to use ETFs as a cover to justify the fundraising story?
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 01-06 12:50
Listen, listen, it's that same old "native coexistence" rhetoric... I've checked all the on-chain data, which project dares to truly run RWA? No matter how good the words sound, it's useless. It depends on whether there are backdoors in the smart contracts and the fund flow of large addresses.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 01-06 12:50
It's the old debate of centralization vs decentralization—after all this, it still comes down to institutions footing the bill.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 01-06 12:46
It's the old debate of centralization vs decentralization again. Now you want to play with the underlying ETF structure, right... Sounds good, but can it really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashiervip
· 01-06 12:34
This logic is actually a bit far-fetched... Can RWA truly coexist natively? It still seems unavoidable to bypass the compliance hurdle.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuckvip
· 01-06 12:34
This architecture doesn't sound particularly new; it mainly depends on who can truly implement it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7vip
· 01-06 12:31
This ETF's underlying design sounds good, but could it just be empty talk?
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguyvip
· 01-06 12:26
It's the same old story... Do they really think institutions will abandon security audits just for "native coexistence"?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)