For a community to develop healthily and sustainably, the key lies in transforming retail holders into true stakeholders. Let's look at an interesting case.

A certain community recruited 58 core members in its first phase. Through a period of accumulation and consensus filtering, 46 members were ultimately retained. What does this indicate? It shows that not everyone can adapt to the rhythm of community building. Now they are launching the second recruitment phase with straightforward criteria: first, confidence in the project's long-term prospects; second, holding more than 100,000 in genuine tokens (small transactions are allowed as long as they don't dump).

This logic is actually very clear. The amount of tokens held reflects participation level, but more importantly, attitude—are you willing to contribute to the ecosystem? This is not just about holding, but about the determination to participate in building.

Let's also look at the rights and benefits design. What can ordinary members do? Participate and watch the show. But what can core members do? They gain access to: beta testing opportunities for new projects, governance voting weight, direct channels for weekly dialogues with the core team, exclusive airdrops and growth dividends, and on-chain identity verification. This system directly links participation and rewards, while providing clear identity markers.

The last point worth noting is the free advanced courses. The community is cultivating leaders, not just holding owners. This indicates they are considering the ecosystem's self-reproduction ability and long-term sustainability. Moving from passive participation to active building, from holder to decision-maker, the progression of identity essentially reflects a progression of power and responsibility.