Your point makes sense. However, I believe that the emergence of "farming behavior" is fundamentally due to kaito introducing the yaps system and the leaderboard mechanism.
Looking at it from another angle—without yaps and without a leaderboard, no one would label posting behavior as "farming." Users would just be posting, plain and simple. The voices of high-reputation accounts would naturally surface, and signals would spread organically.
So ultimately, it's not that users have become worse, but that the ranking mechanism itself has changed the incentive structure. When reputation can be quantified, ranked, and seen, people's behavioral logic changes accordingly. This phenomenon occurs in any system with a leaderboard—the mechanism design determines the behavior pattern.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
orphaned_block
· 11h ago
It's a real eye-opener; leaderboards are indeed the root of all evil.
View OriginalReply0
BlockDetective
· 01-07 06:07
That's right, mechanism design is the real culprit.
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 01-06 10:43
Once the leaderboard appears, human nature begins to deteriorate... This is not a moral issue, but a systemic one.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 01-06 10:29
Bro, your analysis is spot on. The leaderboard is a real devil.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 01-06 10:29
Haha, you're right. The leaderboard is just a Pandora's box.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 01-06 10:28
As soon as the leaderboard appears, human nature reveals its true form.
Your point makes sense. However, I believe that the emergence of "farming behavior" is fundamentally due to kaito introducing the yaps system and the leaderboard mechanism.
Looking at it from another angle—without yaps and without a leaderboard, no one would label posting behavior as "farming." Users would just be posting, plain and simple. The voices of high-reputation accounts would naturally surface, and signals would spread organically.
So ultimately, it's not that users have become worse, but that the ranking mechanism itself has changed the incentive structure. When reputation can be quantified, ranked, and seen, people's behavioral logic changes accordingly. This phenomenon occurs in any system with a leaderboard—the mechanism design determines the behavior pattern.