Asset management companies don't have as broad a path as you might think. To put it simply, they rely on management fees for a living, and the industry's ceiling is limited by the global asset scale. Breaking through is also difficult—competition on fee rates is becoming increasingly fierce, leaving very little room for expansion. Even reaching a valuation of a hundred billion USD is considered quite good. In comparison, trading platforms or infrastructure projects with strong narratives are in a completely different league in terms of potential.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
zkNoobvip
· 01-06 08:57
It's not even worth doing an exchange directly; management fees are really not worth it.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenixvip
· 01-06 08:55
The management fee model indeed has a clear ceiling, but don't forget, companies that can steadily earn management fees are actually the most stable through cycles... Compared to projects that rely on narratives to survive, they are much less risky.
View OriginalReply0
GasSavingMastervip
· 01-06 08:46
Management fees are really just a ceiling. That said, why does everyone still flock in...
View OriginalReply0
BoredStakervip
· 01-06 08:38
The management fee model indeed has a clear ceiling, not comparable to the kind of imagination that exchanges have.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)