2026-01-06 07:22:30

Over 35 million tokens have been removed from circulation through burning. This represents a significant reduction in token supply, a move commonly seen across blockchain projects seeking to manage inflation and potentially support price stability.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-7b078580

· 01-09 07:20

Do the data show that 35 million is really enough? When calculated hourly, it's still a drop in the bucket... Although, this kind of deflationary mechanism has been tried before at historic lows. In the end? Miners are consuming too much, and transaction fees will rise again. Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

ApyWhisperer

· 01-09 01:40

Burning 35 million coins... Is that for real? That's a pretty aggressive move.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 01-08 16:49

The selling pressure has decreased; now it's just a matter of whether it can hold up afterwards.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-06 07:52

3.5 billion coins burned? That's quite a strong move, but it's also good that it can stabilize the price.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentTherapist

· 01-06 07:51

Burning 35 million coins sounds like a lot, but can it really stabilize the price? I don't believe you for a second.

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 01-06 07:37

Damn, 350 million coins burned directly? That's quite a move... Really daring to do it.

View OriginalReply0

FrogInTheWell

· 01-06 07:35

Destroy 35 million? Haha, you've been using this line for so long, do you really think we've all forgotten?

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon

· 01-06 07:33

Are 35 million all burned? Can this move stabilize the price, or is it just another tactic to hold the market?

View OriginalReply0

ProveMyZK

· 01-06 07:30

Bro, the extent of the destruction looks okay, but it depends on how it will be executed later... It would be strange if they can really stabilize the price.

View OriginalReply0

TokenSleuth