Recently, a move by the U.S. Department of Justice has caused a stir—they seized approximately $6.3 million worth of Bitcoin assets that were previously confiscated from a plea agreement with the developer of the Samourai wallet. This incident has sparked heated discussion, mainly due to conflicting policy directions.
Some politicians have publicly stated that these assets should be included in the United States' Bitcoin strategic reserves rather than being sold off directly on the market. Senator Cynthia Lummis even explicitly questioned the reasonableness of the DOJ's decision. She pointed out that, in the context of many countries actively increasing their Bitcoin holdings and deploying digital asset strategies, the U.S. recklessly selling such strategic assets is indeed worth reconsidering.
From a market perspective, this reflects differing internal views in the U.S. on how to position Bitcoin—whether as confiscated criminal proceeds to be liquidated immediately or as a strategic asset to be held long-term. As Bitcoin market volatility intensifies, such policy movements have also become a key focus for investors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 01-09 02:32
Here we go again, I've seen this script before. Losing $6.3 million in the market, it's just lost. Anyway, the US government has never really decided what it wants. I've been through this in 2018; by the time regulators took action, the market had already digested it. Now, when it comes to selling off, they suddenly remember strategic reserves? It's too late.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleeper
· 01-06 12:06
Selling off again? The US really can't understand it—watching others accumulate coins while they keep pouring out...
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 01-06 04:54
It's the same old script again, confiscate with the left hand, sell off with the right hand, really treating BTC like stolen goods that have been confiscated. The whole world is accumulating strategic reserves, but over here in the US, it's as if there's nowhere to spend money, so they insist on dumping. Lummis is right, this decision-making logic is comparable to some rug pull protocol governance—legitimate on the surface, but actually courting disaster.
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 01-06 04:50
$6.3 million just like that? Is the US really serious or just joking with me...
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 01-06 04:44
The US's move is too outrageous. Lummis is right... the whole world is stockpiling, and we're just selling off directly. Are you out of your mind?
View OriginalReply0
FOMOmonster
· 01-06 04:41
$6.3 million just thrown away like that, truly incredible. Weren't you supposed to accumulate coins? Seizing with the left hand and selling with the right hand, and still want to compare Bitcoin reserves with foreign countries? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
GasBankrupter
· 01-06 04:26
You're here fighting with yourself again, selling off 6.3 million USD like this—really unbelievable.
Recently, a move by the U.S. Department of Justice has caused a stir—they seized approximately $6.3 million worth of Bitcoin assets that were previously confiscated from a plea agreement with the developer of the Samourai wallet. This incident has sparked heated discussion, mainly due to conflicting policy directions.
Some politicians have publicly stated that these assets should be included in the United States' Bitcoin strategic reserves rather than being sold off directly on the market. Senator Cynthia Lummis even explicitly questioned the reasonableness of the DOJ's decision. She pointed out that, in the context of many countries actively increasing their Bitcoin holdings and deploying digital asset strategies, the U.S. recklessly selling such strategic assets is indeed worth reconsidering.
From a market perspective, this reflects differing internal views in the U.S. on how to position Bitcoin—whether as confiscated criminal proceeds to be liquidated immediately or as a strategic asset to be held long-term. As Bitcoin market volatility intensifies, such policy movements have also become a key focus for investors.