Every time I see people coming together and achieving great results, everyone has all kinds of ideas to team up and participate, but in the end, due to various stories, it gets shelved.
🌟The crypto community groups have always been about doing less
I've been in quite a few groups and found that the final outcome of all these groups is always a decrease in active members, even if the group size increases, the number of people talking decreases.
And there are all kinds of reasons.
It's like some groups are similar to "girls' dormitories," where a group of 20 can form 800 small groups🤣.
Have you seen groups where the admin doesn't know what their purpose is, and they keep provoking members' relationships within the group😂? Anyway, it's quite funny, and there's even "baiting law enforcement," which really opened my eyes.
It's just entertainment; everyone isn't fools, and once the chat logs are thrown out, you can tell who the "troublemaker" really is.
So I’ve noticed groups that keep disbanding and reforming, but the number of people keeps decreasing.
Of course, some people also choose to leave voluntarily, after all, many small groups end up with just a few people showing off, and after a while, they get tired of pretending and leave😧.
🌟The quality of a group depends on your own ability
People tend to band together, all aiming for better things, and choosing teammates means choosing talented people. Have you ever seen someone dragging along newcomers😄?
It seems I remember, previously @lspdao really had newcomers, rushing into the circle with extreme freedom, but I can only say it’s very difficult.
So instead of relying on others, it’s better to improve yourself. After all, the premise of banding together is to keep warm together.
And if you're in a group where others are sharing and guiding you, sometimes you might feel a bit uncomfortable staying, so you leave😭.
In the end, having at least one strength is important; social skills are also valuable. This round has shown everyone that being eloquent and versatile can also make money, as long as you choose the right target.
🌟A sudden impulse can lead to a dead group
Most sharing groups end up dead unless they can always get positive feedback, regardless of what kind.
Some people feel they do more while others do less; some are just not skilled😂.
I've seen some small groups with high quality that still exist today, but they are full of sarcasm. Interestingly, their bravado often ends with whoever has more money being considered more impressive.
Today, many "teams" are recruiting, and most will end the same way. Few can persist, because many things online cannot be "delivered" through the internet.
In the end, it still depends on whether you can keep getting "positive feedback," or maybe just have more patience?
It's like @eswdesqaz, my roommate, who has been "beaten" countless times online and now doesn't know what to do when he’s offline in Dali😈.
Countless people, countless groups.
✍️Finished with the water
Joined countless groups, left countless groups, and in the end, maybe everyone will realize that only they themselves are their biggest ALPHA.
By the way, I want to say that @virtuals_io is indeed the best team I’ve seen so far, whether in doing things or market making.
It's just a pity there aren’t many "interactive" airdrop opportunities. Speaking of which, @xmaquina and @virtuals_io collaborated, does @axisrobotics have any collaboration ideas?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
✍️Is it time to assemble a team again?
Every time I see people coming together and achieving great results, everyone has all kinds of ideas to team up and participate, but in the end, due to various stories, it gets shelved.
🌟The crypto community groups have always been about doing less
I've been in quite a few groups and found that the final outcome of all these groups is always a decrease in active members, even if the group size increases, the number of people talking decreases.
And there are all kinds of reasons.
It's like some groups are similar to "girls' dormitories," where a group of 20 can form 800 small groups🤣.
Have you seen groups where the admin doesn't know what their purpose is, and they keep provoking members' relationships within the group😂? Anyway, it's quite funny, and there's even "baiting law enforcement," which really opened my eyes.
It's just entertainment; everyone isn't fools, and once the chat logs are thrown out, you can tell who the "troublemaker" really is.
So I’ve noticed groups that keep disbanding and reforming, but the number of people keeps decreasing.
Of course, some people also choose to leave voluntarily, after all, many small groups end up with just a few people showing off, and after a while, they get tired of pretending and leave😧.
🌟The quality of a group depends on your own ability
People tend to band together, all aiming for better things, and choosing teammates means choosing talented people. Have you ever seen someone dragging along newcomers😄?
It seems I remember, previously @lspdao really had newcomers, rushing into the circle with extreme freedom, but I can only say it’s very difficult.
So instead of relying on others, it’s better to improve yourself. After all, the premise of banding together is to keep warm together.
And if you're in a group where others are sharing and guiding you, sometimes you might feel a bit uncomfortable staying, so you leave😭.
In the end, having at least one strength is important; social skills are also valuable. This round has shown everyone that being eloquent and versatile can also make money, as long as you choose the right target.
🌟A sudden impulse can lead to a dead group
Most sharing groups end up dead unless they can always get positive feedback, regardless of what kind.
Some people feel they do more while others do less; some are just not skilled😂.
I've seen some small groups with high quality that still exist today, but they are full of sarcasm. Interestingly, their bravado often ends with whoever has more money being considered more impressive.
Today, many "teams" are recruiting, and most will end the same way. Few can persist, because many things online cannot be "delivered" through the internet.
In the end, it still depends on whether you can keep getting "positive feedback," or maybe just have more patience?
It's like @eswdesqaz, my roommate, who has been "beaten" countless times online and now doesn't know what to do when he’s offline in Dali😈.
Countless people, countless groups.
✍️Finished with the water
Joined countless groups, left countless groups, and in the end, maybe everyone will realize that only they themselves are their biggest ALPHA.
By the way, I want to say that @virtuals_io is indeed the best team I’ve seen so far, whether in doing things or market making.
It's just a pity there aren’t many "interactive" airdrop opportunities. Speaking of which, @xmaquina and @virtuals_io collaborated, does @axisrobotics have any collaboration ideas?