You often see people mixing up concepts when interpreting token holding data. Let’s clarify this.
In data released by a certain exchange, the top ten addresses hold 99%—that sounds alarming, but you need to understand what this 99% refers to. It’s 99% of the 223 addresses being analyzed, not 99% of all market holders. These are two different things.
A simple check reveals the truth: adding up the percentages of those 223 addresses just happens to total exactly 100%. This indicates that the data is based on a sample within that specific group.
To put it more plainly—if my holdings are 80% PEPE, does that mean 80% of all PEPE in the market are in my hands? Obviously not. Holding share and market share are two different metrics.
So next time you see this kind of statistic, think carefully about what exactly is being measured and the scope of the data. Don’t be fooled by the surface numbers.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoGoldmine
· 01-07 11:43
This data method is indeed easy to deceive; the fact that 223 addresses add up to exactly 100% clearly indicates a problem.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidator
· 01-07 05:47
This is just a data scam. How many people are fooled and stunned by the number 99%, I'm truly amazed.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1
· 01-06 08:36
This 99% trick is really amazing; someone always gets scammed every time.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThrice
· 01-04 19:50
Damn, I've also fallen for this data scam before. Luckily, I didn't go all in.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuru
· 01-04 19:46
Wow, this example is brilliant. How many people are fooled by this kind of data every day?
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91
· 01-04 19:39
There are really too many people who deliberately confuse concepts like this, and I always want to smash the screen every time I see it.
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 01-04 19:30
Haha, I've seen this data trick too many times, it's just using 223 addresses to scare people.
View OriginalReply0
PonziDetector
· 01-04 19:29
Damn, these data traps are happening every day. How many people are just fooled like this?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeGazer
· 01-04 19:27
Watching people scare others with this kind of data is really outrageous
You often see people mixing up concepts when interpreting token holding data. Let’s clarify this.
In data released by a certain exchange, the top ten addresses hold 99%—that sounds alarming, but you need to understand what this 99% refers to. It’s 99% of the 223 addresses being analyzed, not 99% of all market holders. These are two different things.
A simple check reveals the truth: adding up the percentages of those 223 addresses just happens to total exactly 100%. This indicates that the data is based on a sample within that specific group.
To put it more plainly—if my holdings are 80% PEPE, does that mean 80% of all PEPE in the market are in my hands? Obviously not. Holding share and market share are two different metrics.
So next time you see this kind of statistic, think carefully about what exactly is being measured and the scope of the data. Don’t be fooled by the surface numbers.