2026-01-04 17:20:10

Rayls is changing the game. It's not about bringing banks into crypto — it's about bringing banking infrastructure into the blockchain.

The difference is huge. While most projects try to force the traditional financial system to fit on-chain (result? rigid, complex), Rayls completely reverses the logic.

The strategy? Private networks ensuring compliance, public networks for scale. Two layers, one goal: bring the robustness of banks without losing the freedom of decentralization.

RLS-4,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropChaser

· 01-07 07:16

It's that kind of "disruptive logic" again, which sounds pretty intimidating. But this private network + public network approach... isn't it just centralized with a different disguise? I don't quite understand.

View OriginalReply0

CafeMinor

· 01-07 03:08

This double-layer network logic is quite interesting, but as for the private network... can it truly guarantee it won't be hijacked?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropGrandpa

· 01-04 17:50

To be honest, I'm tired of projects that try to "integrate" traditional finance, and most of them end up abandoned. Rayls' two-layer architecture idea does have some potential, but whether compliance and decentralization can truly coexist remains to be seen.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretter

· 01-04 17:49

To be honest, I'm quite interested in the idea of these two-layer networks, but can the compliance aspect really be reliable?

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 01-04 17:38

Another story of "disrupting traditional finance." I've heard it too many times. But this time, the two-layer network design is quite interesting—private layer for compliance, public layer for operations. From a technical perspective, the sustainability of this architecture is worth paying attention to. But the problem is, historical data shows that the projects that hype themselves the most always die during the execution phase. Risk warning: don't be fooled by the word "stability"; only those that truly survive are the true winners.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-04 17:31

Private + public dual networks are indeed attractive, but I'm worried they will ultimately become tools for large institutions.

View OriginalReply0