The issuer of stablecoins restricting operational permissions for specific blockchain addresses has become a standard method of collaborating with law enforcement agencies to combat crime. Over the past few years, the two major stablecoin ecosystems, Tether and Circle, have already established mature communication mechanisms with global regulatory authorities, forming a strong deterrent against criminals and entities using cryptocurrencies for illegal activities.
According to data from on-chain monitoring agencies, the total number of frozen on-chain addresses in 2025 has risen to a record high of 3,958, surpassing the combined total of 3,199 frozen addresses over the previous four years — the situation is indeed tightening.
Specifically, in a recent case on January 1, 2026, USDT issuer Tether blacklisted 6 addresses on the Tron and Ethereum networks. This type of law enforcement action signals that governance within the stablecoin ecosystem is evolving towards greater standardization and strictness. For industry participants, this is undoubtedly a clear reminder — the importance of compliant operations is on the rise.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretDiary
· 22h ago
Frozen addresses are soaring again, and now there's really no privacy left on the chain.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 22h ago
The freezing speed is so fast, it feels like the crypto world is about to be regulated to death.
Stablecoins should be regulated, otherwise it will really get chaotic.
By the way, if this continues, how will ordinary users play? It's too difficult.
Compliance is correct, but isn't this pace a bit harsh...
3,958 addresses, this number looks a bit scary.
Tether's methods have now become standard practice, there's nothing we can do about it.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-06 20:30
The number of frozen addresses has reached a new all-time high, and the on-chain movement space is really getting smaller and smaller.
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLonger
· 01-06 16:21
Frozen address again? Damn, this is getting serious. Regulations are tightening more and more. How am I supposed to buy the dip?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHunter
· 01-04 14:53
More and more addresses are being frozen; it feels like the crypto world can no longer return to the lawless era.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRider
· 01-04 14:53
More and more addresses are being frozen, this is the cost of centralization.
Now stablecoins are basically tools for law enforcement.
Tether's approach feels like it's not far from being fully controlled.
3958 addresses? Last year it wasn't even close to that, the speed is terrifying.
Compliance sounds good, but once power is unleashed, it can't be taken back.
The dream of blockchain decentralization is losing something again.
If this continues, can stablecoins still be considered crypto? It's quite ironic.
What's the difference between pulling someone's address and freezing an account? I just don't get it.
Regulators are reaching further and further, we should be cautious.
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchain
· 01-04 14:52
Frozen numbers hit a new high again, it feels like there's no secret left on the chain...
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 01-04 14:50
There are so many frozen addresses, it really feels like the crypto world is about to "whitewash" itself.
Is it true? Tether just bans addresses at will, and with our small assets, we have to be cautious.
Now it's better, we have to honestly use cryptocurrencies.
Frozen this and frozen that every day, is compliance really about protection or restriction?
Cracking down on illegal activities is good, but are they overreaching...
Regulations are tightening more and more, small retail investors are caught in the middle and feel uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 01-04 14:44
ngl, the acceleration in address blacklistings is pretty telling—3958 in one year vs 3199 over four? the pattern velocity alone screams institutional pressure ramping up. tether's just the enforcement arm everyone knew was coming.
Reply0
NFTRegretful
· 01-04 14:24
More and more addresses are being frozen. This time, it's really happening.
The issuer of stablecoins restricting operational permissions for specific blockchain addresses has become a standard method of collaborating with law enforcement agencies to combat crime. Over the past few years, the two major stablecoin ecosystems, Tether and Circle, have already established mature communication mechanisms with global regulatory authorities, forming a strong deterrent against criminals and entities using cryptocurrencies for illegal activities.
According to data from on-chain monitoring agencies, the total number of frozen on-chain addresses in 2025 has risen to a record high of 3,958, surpassing the combined total of 3,199 frozen addresses over the previous four years — the situation is indeed tightening.
Specifically, in a recent case on January 1, 2026, USDT issuer Tether blacklisted 6 addresses on the Tron and Ethereum networks. This type of law enforcement action signals that governance within the stablecoin ecosystem is evolving towards greater standardization and strictness. For industry participants, this is undoubtedly a clear reminder — the importance of compliant operations is on the rise.