2026-01-03 18:20:19

The current liquidity fragmentation issue in the crypto market is very severe. Over $50 billion worth of assets are locked on the Solana chain, and the Ethereum ecosystem has surpassed $100 billion in scale, but capital flow between the two mainstream public chains is like being frozen. Traditional cross-chain bridging solutions are ridiculously slow, requiring waiting for transaction confirmations, and pose significant risks to liquidity providers. A new approach is beginning to emerge—through on-chain proxy routing, enabling cross-chain arbitrage discovery and execution within seconds. The logic of this Universal Routing technology is straightforward: smart contracts capture arbitrage opportunities on Ethereum in real-time, offline compute the optimal path, and then directly execute transactions on the Solana side. Compared to traditional bridges that rely on waiting and intermediary confirmations, this solution transforms cross-chain from a "slow ferry" into an "instant channel." DeFi gameplay is upgrading.

SOL-2,53%

ETH-3,87%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ResearchChadButBroke

· 01-05 17:49

Second-level execution? Sounds good, but it really has to be implementable; otherwise, it's just a bunch of PPT proposals.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 01-05 17:16

Microsecond cross-chain arbitrage? Sounds awesome, but I'm more curious whether this Universal Routing can really withstand large liquidity shocks. --- Once again, a new technology claims to save the day, but it will probably just lead to some chain being drained. --- Wait, offline calculation of the optimal path... Isn't that just a fancy way of saying centralized risk? --- Solana and ETH have been stuck for so long; it seems someone is really making money with new methods. --- Fast execution in seconds sounds impressive, but what about slippage control? Is anyone discussing this? --- Liquidity fragmentation has always been the most painful issue in DeFi. If this can truly be solved, that would be amazing. --- Calling it an "instant channel" sounds nice, but who will take the blame if something goes wrong? --- Universal Routing feels like the next big trend; looking forward to seeing which protocols are about to take off.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-04 01:37

Microsecond-level cross-chain arbitrage? Sounds pretty good, but I wonder if slippage will eat up all the profits... --- Another "instant channel," another "upgraded gameplay," and in the end, it's just being drained by mev bots. --- Something's off. Offline path calculation followed by on-chain execution. Who will fill this information gap in the middle? --- Finally, someone has pointed out this pain point. Traditional bridges are really garbage. --- Universal Routing sounds awesome, but running it in a production environment is a whole different story. --- Wait, with 50 billion and 100 billion in funds, can this really make them flow freely? --- Arbitrageurs are ecstatic, another arbitrage opportunity... but first, we need to see the security audit. --- Compared to traditional bridging, I believe in it. The key is whether the costs can be reduced. --- Microsecond execution sounds powerful, but I'm more concerned about how much slippage plus gas fees will total.

View OriginalReply0

CrossChainBreather

· 01-03 18:50

Second-level cross-chain routing? Sounds impressive, but how many can actually operate stably? We still need to be cautious about the risks.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketHustler

· 01-03 18:48

Second-level cross-chain arbitrage? Sounds great, but can this Universal Routing really handle that 200 billion... It feels like another overhyped solution. I have to say, the disconnect between ETH and SOL is really frustrating, but the question is—who will bear the risk of this "instant channel"? And here comes another solution. Didn't the last cross-chain bridge also claim to be revolutionary? Wait, if it can really execute in seconds, do arbitrageurs still need to compete with us peasants... haha. Offline calculation of the optimal path sounds good, but once it's on-chain, it’s doomed to blow up. Did Solana really absorb 50 billion? I feel like everyone is just playing mahjong.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaBrain

· 01-03 18:47

Second-level cross-chain execution? Isn't this exactly what I've been bragging about in the group? Finally, someone has written it out. Traditional bridging should have been eliminated long ago; that confirmation mechanism is just a capital meat grinder.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 01-03 18:44

Second-level cross-chain? That's what I want to hear. Finally, someone has solved this longstanding problem. Traditional bridging is really slow and kills profits. I tried it once between two chains, and the fees ate up half of the gains, which totally crushed my mood. The Universal Routing logic sounds reliable, but the key is whether it can actually work in real environments. Don't let it turn out to be just a utopia on paper.

View OriginalReply0

MoonBoi42

· 01-03 18:37

Second-level cross-chain arbitrage? Sounds good, but is bridge security really guaranteed, or is there another new attack surface?

View OriginalReply0

RektCoaster

· 01-03 18:29

Second-level cross-chain arbitrage? Sounds good, but I just want to ask, is this Universal Routing really reliable, or is it just another hyped-up concept?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedTwice

· 01-03 18:27

Second-level cross-chain arbitrage? Sounds awesome, but I just want to ask—can it really work, or is it just another new way to scam investors?

View OriginalReply0