Why do many people have a negative outlook on buybacks?
The logic is actually very simple—holding chips means there are continuous opportunities coming your way. Once you diversify your chips to do buybacks or other operations, your liquidity gets locked, and your purchasing power diminishes. And those saturated funds? They've already turned to find the next player with available capacity.
Instead of blindly participating in buyback expectations, it's better to maintain sufficient ammunition reserves. The market's greatest test is always who can hold onto their chips at critical moments.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchroedingerMiner
· 01-06 16:55
That's right, chips are about the right to speak; once dispersed, it's gone. I've always thought that those promoting buybacks just want you to get off first.
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboy
· 01-06 05:44
That's right, having reserves in hand means you're not worried. Once liquidity is locked, you become a lamb waiting to be slaughtered.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 01-04 04:57
You're right, saving bullets is more important than anything else.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 01-03 17:51
Basically, it's being cowardly. If you've already used all your bullets, how can you buy the dip? That's the difference.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunner
· 01-03 17:50
Chips need to be held tightly; once they are dispersed, it's over. The ones who truly make money are always the most energetic, not those trapped by buybacks.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 01-03 17:49
Holding chips is holding opportunities. Once they are dispersed, it's over. That's why it's just best to listen when it comes to buybacks.
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 01-03 17:45
Holding chips > doing buybacks. The logic isn't that complicated. Once the funds are dispersed, it's equivalent to self-sabotage; liquidity dies, purchasing power is gone, and there's no chance of a turnaround.
View OriginalReply0
NestedFox
· 01-03 17:32
Well said, holding onto the chips is the key. When the opportunity comes, going all in is the way to go. Rebuying that set? It's purely helping the big players unload.
Why do many people have a negative outlook on buybacks?
The logic is actually very simple—holding chips means there are continuous opportunities coming your way. Once you diversify your chips to do buybacks or other operations, your liquidity gets locked, and your purchasing power diminishes. And those saturated funds? They've already turned to find the next player with available capacity.
Instead of blindly participating in buyback expectations, it's better to maintain sufficient ammunition reserves. The market's greatest test is always who can hold onto their chips at critical moments.