2026-01-03 17:27:15

I have a question for major data tracking platforms—those projects that promised airdrops but haven't fulfilled them yet. Can you identify and mark these projects in the visualization? Many projects promote aggressively in the early stages, but once the airdrop deadline passes, there's no follow-up. If these "missed" projects could be highlighted separately in the charts, investors would have a clearer understanding. After all, the degree of promise fulfillment somewhat reflects the credibility of the project team. This would also help improve transparency across the entire ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LostBetweenChains

· 01-06 14:50

This idea is pretty good, but to be honest, data platforms probably don't have that motivation either, after all, the projects are their main sponsors.

View OriginalReply0

GasGrillMaster

· 01-04 13:03

Wake up, everyone. Most of these airdrop providers are scammers. What's the point of marking them?

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 01-03 17:57

ngl this is exactly why i built my own tracking sheet... watched the transaction patterns on these "pending airdrop" wallets for months, zero movement. classic rugpull signature honestly

Reply0

FUD_Vaccinated

· 01-03 17:56

Really? This suggestion is excellent. These "ghosting" projects should be marked in red separately to prevent retail investors from foolishly waiting.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 01-03 17:49

That's so true. Airdrop no-shows are now just a common occurrence. It would be perfect if these data platforms could mark the "debt kings" in red.

View OriginalReply0

MevSandwich

· 01-03 17:44

To be honest, this idea is pretty good but extremely difficult... If the data platform really does this, they will probably offend enough project teams to make a big fuss.

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 01-03 17:42

This idea is good, but the problem is that the data platform itself also needs to be motivated to mark this up.

View OriginalReply0

pvt_key_collector

· 01-03 17:40

That's a good idea, but data platforms probably don't want to shoot themselves in the foot... after all, many project teams are also big sponsors.

View OriginalReply0