You don't need firsthand memories of the dot-com crash to grasp what a bubble looks like—but comparing that era to what's happening in crypto markets now? That's where people often miss the forest for the trees. The dynamics are genuinely different. Back then, it was FOMO-driven retail chasing unlimited domain registrations and companies with zero revenue models. Today's crypto cycles, while volatile, operate on entirely different mechanics: actual protocol development, tokenomics, institutional adoption, and market infrastructure that didn't exist in 1999. Sure, speculation exists in both, but the context matters. One was a valuations game built on air; this space has fundamental layers beneath the chaos. The point? Don't just copy-paste historical lessons without understanding what's actually changed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PortfolioAlert
· 8h ago
The idea is correct, but reality is more complicated... Are institutions really making moves?
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 14h ago
Nah, this time it's really different. The protocol and infrastructure are right there.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntress
· 01-03 16:59
Honestly, this wave in the crypto world is nothing like the internet bubble. It's ridiculous for people to force-fit it into historical frameworks.
View OriginalReply0
MoodFollowsPrice
· 01-02 14:11
That's right, don't always compare the current crypto to dotcoms; they are fundamentally not the same thing.
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZK
· 01-02 14:10
That's right, we can't forcibly impose the historical framework. The current on-chain infrastructure is fundamentally not the same as it was back then.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 01-02 13:57
That's right, but right now a bunch of people see the coin price fluctuations and scream "Another bubble," which is really just a pattern. In the 90s, that group of people were raising money without even having a product. At least here, we have protocols, ecosystems, and institutions with real money coming in. Can it be the same? Details determine success or failure, brother.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeOnChain
· 01-02 13:52
Honestly, the 99 wave is indeed different from now, but I also don't believe there's completely no bubble...
View OriginalReply0
PonziWhisperer
· 01-02 13:44
The mess from 1999 can't be compared to now at all. People are always in a rush to apply templates.
You don't need firsthand memories of the dot-com crash to grasp what a bubble looks like—but comparing that era to what's happening in crypto markets now? That's where people often miss the forest for the trees. The dynamics are genuinely different. Back then, it was FOMO-driven retail chasing unlimited domain registrations and companies with zero revenue models. Today's crypto cycles, while volatile, operate on entirely different mechanics: actual protocol development, tokenomics, institutional adoption, and market infrastructure that didn't exist in 1999. Sure, speculation exists in both, but the context matters. One was a valuations game built on air; this space has fundamental layers beneath the chaos. The point? Don't just copy-paste historical lessons without understanding what's actually changed.