Here's the investing puzzle nobody talks about enough. Buffett tells everyday investors to buy index funds—solid advice, right? But think about it differently. What if you didn't have to choose? What if your portfolio included Berkshire Hathaway shares alongside index fund positions?



The numbers tell an interesting story. Berkshire has compounded at 19.9% historically. That's significantly ahead of what broad market indices typically deliver. So the real question becomes: why would you settle for average market returns when you could own a concentrated position in a proven compounder plus maintain your diversified index exposure?

It's not about picking stocks over index funds—it's about strategic layering. Different investors, different risk tolerances, different time horizons. The index fund argument works. The Berkshire approach works too. But combining both? That's where the conversation gets interesting for those willing to do the homework.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshivip
· 7h ago
There's no need to choose one or the other; a combination of BRK+ index funds is actually the way to go... Anyway, idle money is meant to be tinkered with. --- A 19.9% compound return is indeed impressive, but that's also why most people still buy index funds — a steady mindset. --- Warren Buffett's theories are fine, but if you actually follow his advice, you might not make money — isn't that ironic? --- Strategic layering sounds fancy, but it's just about not putting all your eggs in one basket, a well-known principle. --- The problem is most people are too lazy to do their homework and still think they can earn 19.9% by luck. --- BRK has outperformed the market for many years, but can it be replicated now? That's the key. --- Forget it, I'll just stick to regular index investing to avoid overthinking and getting cut.
View OriginalReply0
MelonFieldvip
· 7h ago
Even Buffett himself has a concentrated position. Letting retail investors buy index funds is just a way to level the playing field, haha.
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPullvip
· 7h ago
NGL, this statement sounds pretty good, but it still feels a bit too good to be true... A 19.9% historical return is indeed impressive, but the past doesn't guarantee the future, brother.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlertvip
· 7h ago
A 19.9% compound return is indeed attractive, but the key still depends on individual risk tolerance—not everyone can handle the volatility.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaservip
· 7h ago
A 19.9% compound return is indeed impressive, but how many truly dare to go all in on Berkshire Hathaway? A layered allocation is still more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHuntervip
· 7h ago
19.9% vs market average, this gap is indeed significant... but on the other hand, how many can consistently outperform the index?
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchormanvip
· 7h ago
Even Buffett himself is accumulating Berkshire Hathaway, so why should retail investors only buy index funds...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)