Want to see how the $50 trillion liquidity release will impact the market? The most effective way is to review past records.
The Federal Reserve has implemented three rounds of large-scale easing, and each round's asset performance has been quite different.
**In 2008**, right after the financial crisis, the Fed launched over $2 trillion in quantitative easing. Which assets surged the most at that time? Gold led the way (up 120%), followed closely by US stocks (S&P 500 up 80%), emerging market equities (up 60%), and bonds lagged behind (up 20%). The logic is straightforward—liquidity enters to repair the financial system, driven by demand for safe-haven assets and recovering risk appetite, making gold and stocks the biggest beneficiaries.
**In 2020 during the pandemic**, it was completely different. The Fed emergency-printed over $3 trillion, and what happened? Tech stocks soared (Nasdaq 100 up 70%), cryptocurrencies skyrocketed (up 500%), gold only increased by 30%, and commodities fared worse (up 25%). The key feature of this round was one word—"intense competition." Money flooded into high-growth, highly elastic sectors, with tech stocks and crypto assets becoming major attractors of capital.
**In 2019**, it was different again, with preemptive rate cuts, releasing over $1 trillion. At that time, the economy was still relatively stable, so liquidity mainly boosted valuations. US stocks led the gains (25%), gold followed (15%), emerging markets (12%), and bonds lagged behind (8%).
Comparing these three rounds, you can see a very interesting phenomenon—the flow of liquidity has never been random.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainSauceMaster
· 9h ago
After three rounds, everyone is doing their own thing. The 2020 crypto surge directly skyrocketed by 500%. Now, another wave is coming? I’m optimistic, but risk management is also necessary.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterZhang
· 9h ago
Damn, that 500% surge in 2020 took off directly. I only freeloaded a little bit, and now I'm still angry about the wipeout wave.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStaker
· 9h ago
Damn, it's always the same pattern of looking at historical data to predict the future... But it is true that the 2020 crypto surge of 500% was really awesome.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 9h ago
Wow, did crypto surge 500% in 2020? I feel like I missed out on a billion, it's really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDay
· 9h ago
Wow, that 2020 crypto surge directly hit 500%? Do I feel like I missed out on a billion?
Want to see how the $50 trillion liquidity release will impact the market? The most effective way is to review past records.
The Federal Reserve has implemented three rounds of large-scale easing, and each round's asset performance has been quite different.
**In 2008**, right after the financial crisis, the Fed launched over $2 trillion in quantitative easing. Which assets surged the most at that time? Gold led the way (up 120%), followed closely by US stocks (S&P 500 up 80%), emerging market equities (up 60%), and bonds lagged behind (up 20%). The logic is straightforward—liquidity enters to repair the financial system, driven by demand for safe-haven assets and recovering risk appetite, making gold and stocks the biggest beneficiaries.
**In 2020 during the pandemic**, it was completely different. The Fed emergency-printed over $3 trillion, and what happened? Tech stocks soared (Nasdaq 100 up 70%), cryptocurrencies skyrocketed (up 500%), gold only increased by 30%, and commodities fared worse (up 25%). The key feature of this round was one word—"intense competition." Money flooded into high-growth, highly elastic sectors, with tech stocks and crypto assets becoming major attractors of capital.
**In 2019**, it was different again, with preemptive rate cuts, releasing over $1 trillion. At that time, the economy was still relatively stable, so liquidity mainly boosted valuations. US stocks led the gains (25%), gold followed (15%), emerging markets (12%), and bonds lagged behind (8%).
Comparing these three rounds, you can see a very interesting phenomenon—the flow of liquidity has never been random.