2026-01-02 11:22:48

To determine whether a Web3 project is reliable or not, the approach is actually quite straightforward: does it focus on speculative innovation or solving process pain points?

Rayls Labs clearly takes the latter route. The project is not about repeatedly stacking financial derivatives on-chain, but rather directly tackling the most difficult problems—how to fully issue real assets on-chain? How to conduct efficient transaction settlement? How to ensure assets flow smoothly within a compliant framework?

These issues may seem basic, but they are precisely the key to whether the RWA (Real World Assets) track can truly mature. Rayls' exploration in this area is worth ongoing attention.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RetroHodler91

· 01-05 11:18

Hmm... RWA is indeed the real deal, unlike those flashy derivatives.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWatcher

· 01-05 11:07

Here we go again, another RWA project. To be honest, I've seen a lot of these kinds of things, but the key question is whether they can actually be implemented.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFries

· 01-05 10:21

Hmm... Projects that solve real-world problems are indeed scarce, but can Rayls' RWA solution really be implemented? --- Compliance + on-chain asset circulation sounds simple, but it's difficult to actually do. --- I just want to know what level of transaction settlement efficiency Rayls can specifically achieve. It's no fun just talking without practice. --- RWA is indeed the right path, but there are too many projects hyped up in the market; it all depends on actual data. --- If asset on-chain can truly solve the problem, then it’s definitely worth paying attention to, but for now, I’m still observing. --- The pain point identification is good; the key is execution. Looking forward to seeing Rayls' real progress.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 01-05 09:02

ngl, rwa infrastructure actually hits different than the usual defi casino stuff... but been there before with projects that *looked* legit on paper. health factors don't lie though, and if rayls is genuinely solving settlement + compliance angles... that's harder to fake than another yield farm tbh. still watching those collateral ratios tho, remember 2022.

Reply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-02 11:50

Tokenizing real assets is indeed a tough nut to crack, but whether Rayls can truly achieve compliant circulation depends on subsequent execution.

View OriginalReply0

LightningHarvester

· 01-02 11:49

Honestly, RWA is truly a gold mine, not those flashy options and futures.

View OriginalReply0

MrRightClick

· 01-02 11:49

Haha, finally someone has clarified the RWA issue, not just shouting slogans.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMortgage

· 01-02 11:39

Honestly, RWA is truly valuable, unlike those flashy derivatives. Getting compliant circulation right is the key to breaking the deadlock. Rayls' approach is reliable. Another pragmatic project; I really like this kind of work style. Every day, people talk about financial innovation, but it's still the same old stuff. Rayls finally has something different. Whether RWA is mature or not depends on whether someone truly solves these fundamental issues. Add a follow.

View OriginalReply0

DuckFluff

· 01-02 11:37

Haha, finally someone is seriously doing real work, not just炒概念 every day.

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 01-02 11:33

Hey, RWA is indeed a tough job. If Rayls can really handle compliance and circulation issues, that would be truly valuable.

View OriginalReply0