#RWA规模呈现持续扩张态势 An observation about $ETH and $TRADOOR: most people entering the crypto space are actually trading based on emotions rather than logic.
I've seen many cases where, after investing savings over several years, they hesitate to sell when prices rise, and blindly hold when prices fall. After a complete cycle, their accounts are left with very little. The issue isn't the choice of coins, but the mismatch in the entire participation approach.
I want to share a practical strategy that scales small capital into large gains. The core logic is simple, but executing it can feel counterintuitive and even awkward.
**Compound interest is the only engine for account growth**
Many understand this as simple buy low, sell high. In reality, the only mechanism that truly grows an account is: turning each round's profit into the next round's principal.
There are only two entry points: a pullback after key liquidity is broken; or abnormal trading volume three days before a new altcoin season. Other signals are noise.
**Three layers of position management**
The first mistake should not exceed 15%. For example, with a 30,000 principal, keep the initial position within 4,500, exit at 5%, aiming for over 30% gains. This step is about learning, not gambling.
After profits are realized, add to positions in stages. When the first trade is profitable, take out 50% to leverage 2x on strong assets; the remaining 50% should be converted to stablecoins to hedge black swan events. When the account reaches 6,000, withdraw the original 30,000 principal first; then all profits are used to push forward, shifting mindset.
**A simple stock selection and operation framework**
Only focus on coins where MACD has a golden cross above zero; the 20-day moving average is a critical line—hold above it, sell immediately below; break above the moving average with volume and stand firm to double down; if it drops below the moving average the next day, cut immediately—don't expect a rebound.
Some details to observe: sideways movement at high levels often signals an imminent surge; sideways at low levels often precedes sharp drops; buy on bearish candles and sell on bullish candles contrary to crowd sentiment; slow decline indicates weak rebound potential, while rapid decline suggests a fierce rebound.
**Final choice**
Profiting in the crypto space has always been for a minority, not because of luck, but because of using the correct methods. $MON and other targets are not the problem; the real issue is your participation logic.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoResearcher
· 5h ago
From the perspective of on-chain data and Tokenomics, the problem with this position management framework is that it completely ignores the incentive incompatibility of liquidity providers. First, the bankruptcy probability of 2x leverage in highly volatile markets has been confirmed by multiple governance proposal data to exceed 60%; second, the assumption of a retest after key liquidity breakthroughs fails within a 95% confidence interval. It is recommended to re-evaluate the risk parameters.
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 12h ago
Honestly, this set of theories looks refreshing, but in practice, I can't stick to it for more than a week because human nature is just so greedy.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 01-02 11:40
Basically, it's a mindset issue. Most people can't hold onto profits at all; they have to squeeze out every last cent to feel satisfied.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 01-02 11:40
Based on historical data, this position management framework indeed aligns with the basic principles of the Kelly criterion, but I have to say—most people simply can't execute it. Especially the part about "withdraw when earning 6000," which requires extremely strong self-discipline, and that's exactly what retail investors lack the most. I've used the MACD + moving average combination before, but it's easy to fall into traps with lagging signals; the key is to confirm with volume. Honestly, no matter how perfect the technical analysis is, black swan events can still break it, so I trust the "black swan protection" stablecoin allocation more.
However, I want to complain a bit—saying "all other signals are noise" is too absolute. On-chain data and whale movements can sometimes be more valuable than candlestick charts. Also, 2x leverage is indeed risky during high volatility periods; I've seen several accounts get liquidated due to extreme market moves. Instead of chasing maximum compound returns, it's more practical to stay stable and survive.
What do you think? Is it better to miss out on opportunities to protect the bottom line, or should you take risks if your risk tolerance allows?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardian
· 01-02 11:40
Basically, it's a matter of execution. Most people simply can't achieve the step of quick profit, they can't get past the psychological barrier.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 01-02 11:28
After all this talk, the same old saying applies: execution is king. Endless armchair strategizing won't get you anywhere.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 01-02 11:26
All this talk boils down to one thing — most people lose money because they have their heads filled with water, not because they chose the wrong coin.
#RWA规模呈现持续扩张态势 An observation about $ETH and $TRADOOR: most people entering the crypto space are actually trading based on emotions rather than logic.
I've seen many cases where, after investing savings over several years, they hesitate to sell when prices rise, and blindly hold when prices fall. After a complete cycle, their accounts are left with very little. The issue isn't the choice of coins, but the mismatch in the entire participation approach.
I want to share a practical strategy that scales small capital into large gains. The core logic is simple, but executing it can feel counterintuitive and even awkward.
**Compound interest is the only engine for account growth**
Many understand this as simple buy low, sell high. In reality, the only mechanism that truly grows an account is: turning each round's profit into the next round's principal.
There are only two entry points: a pullback after key liquidity is broken; or abnormal trading volume three days before a new altcoin season. Other signals are noise.
**Three layers of position management**
The first mistake should not exceed 15%. For example, with a 30,000 principal, keep the initial position within 4,500, exit at 5%, aiming for over 30% gains. This step is about learning, not gambling.
After profits are realized, add to positions in stages. When the first trade is profitable, take out 50% to leverage 2x on strong assets; the remaining 50% should be converted to stablecoins to hedge black swan events. When the account reaches 6,000, withdraw the original 30,000 principal first; then all profits are used to push forward, shifting mindset.
**A simple stock selection and operation framework**
Only focus on coins where MACD has a golden cross above zero; the 20-day moving average is a critical line—hold above it, sell immediately below; break above the moving average with volume and stand firm to double down; if it drops below the moving average the next day, cut immediately—don't expect a rebound.
Some details to observe: sideways movement at high levels often signals an imminent surge; sideways at low levels often precedes sharp drops; buy on bearish candles and sell on bullish candles contrary to crowd sentiment; slow decline indicates weak rebound potential, while rapid decline suggests a fierce rebound.
**Final choice**
Profiting in the crypto space has always been for a minority, not because of luck, but because of using the correct methods. $MON and other targets are not the problem; the real issue is your participation logic.