At a glance, some projects in this chart are indeed disappointing. Reflecting on the promises made by the Grok project at launch and comparing them to its actual performance later, the gap is quite significant. The crypto community has always been strict in judging project quality, which is also a sign of market self-purification. Ultimately, only those with real strength and a clear technical roadmap tend to survive. The market always votes with its feet.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeSurvivor
· 1h ago
As for grok, it's been obvious for a long time; the white paper is full of empty words.
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 8h ago
grok is just a joke now. Do you all forget how loudly that promise was made back then?
View OriginalReply0
ContractTester
· 8h ago
Well, Grok's performance was really disappointing. They hyped it up so much, and this is the result?
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 8h ago
Grok's thing is basically just that the big picture is painted too full. It's time to wake up now.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 8h ago
grok this wave indeed underperformed, where is the promised commitment?
---
Market cleansing is ruthless; trash projects must die.
---
Hard power is the key; just talking is long overdue to cool down.
---
Foot voting never lies; I believe in those who truly have substance.
---
That's why I only pay attention to teams that get things done; everything else is just white noise.
---
Is the gap between promises and reality always like this?
---
Those who survive are the ones with real value; this rule never fails.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 8h ago
Grok, this thing really underperformed; they hyped it up so much, but in the end... it still comes down to real skills.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfer
· 9h ago
Most projects are just PPT tokens. Grok's pump and dump, then they run away. This is the normal state of Web3.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 9h ago
Just say it directly, Grok's stuff has been nonsense from the very beginning. It's only now that I realize it, and I'm really speechless.
At a glance, some projects in this chart are indeed disappointing. Reflecting on the promises made by the Grok project at launch and comparing them to its actual performance later, the gap is quite significant. The crypto community has always been strict in judging project quality, which is also a sign of market self-purification. Ultimately, only those with real strength and a clear technical roadmap tend to survive. The market always votes with its feet.