To be honest, I really can't quite understand the logic of this project.
Watching a bunch of people hype it up, but upon closer thought, where exactly is its competitiveness? The technical highlights are not obvious, and there’s no supporting data for user growth. The funding background is indeed good, but what actual advantages can that translate into?
Can someone explain what the real appeal of this project is? Is it that I haven't grasped the key point, or is there really something unclear about it?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaNomad
· 14h ago
Raising funds doesn't necessarily mean the product is good; I've seen this set before.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStation
· 01-03 18:27
Is it a big smart guy or a big fool? It depends on how it runs later.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 01-02 09:54
I think this is the norm in the crypto world—fundraising looks good, the data has to look good, but no one dares to openly discuss the technology.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 01-02 09:54
Funding looks good, but the key is whether it can be implemented in practice.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 01-02 09:51
The financing side looks glamorous, but the track has no differentiation. This logic indeed doesn't hold up.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffet
· 01-02 09:45
I also want to know about this issue. It seems like everyone is just jumping on the bandwagon and hyping it up.
Is it really impressive if you get funding? There are plenty of projects that burn through money.
I’ve never believed in growth without actual data support.
Lack of technical highlights is indeed a fatal flaw. Can anyone explain it clearly?
Maybe there are parts I haven't understood, but projects that are vague and ambiguous usually aren’t good news.
The name of the funder doesn’t guarantee the project itself is legitimate.
I care more about real user retention rather than those PR stunts.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 01-02 09:40
Funding looks good, but that doesn't mean the product works. I've seen this many times.
To be honest, I really can't quite understand the logic of this project.
Watching a bunch of people hype it up, but upon closer thought, where exactly is its competitiveness? The technical highlights are not obvious, and there’s no supporting data for user growth. The funding background is indeed good, but what actual advantages can that translate into?
Can someone explain what the real appeal of this project is? Is it that I haven't grasped the key point, or is there really something unclear about it?