Creating chart analysis, in simple terms, is a set of geometric logic. To truly understand it, you need to start from the most basic definitions—this may sound like old advice, but it’s actually the most practical in real trading. No matter how complex the trend, returning to fundamental definitions reveals that it’s not so mysterious after all.
The most common stumbling block in pattern analysis is simply the containment relationship between candlesticks. But as long as you understand geometric thinking, some inferences will naturally come to light:
First, use [di, gi] to mark the interval formed by the lowest and highest prices of the i-th candlestick. When breaking upward, a sequence of n consecutive candlesticks with containment relationships is equivalent to the single candlestick corresponding to the interval [maxdi, maxgi]. In other words, these n candlesticks and the candlestick that contains both their highest and lowest points are essentially the same. The downward trend is the reverse, corresponding to the interval [mindi, mingi].
Second, the associative law is the foundation of Chanlun. The analysis of candlestick containment relationships must also follow this law. But here’s a pitfall: containment relationships do not satisfy the transitive law. If candlestick 1 and 2 contain each other, and candlestick 2 and 3 contain each other, it does not mean candlestick 1 and 3 contain each other. Therefore, analysis must be done in sequence: first, determine the containment relationship between candlesticks 1 and 2 to generate a new candlestick; then compare this new candlestick with candlestick 3—if they contain each other, continue combining; if not, treat the new candlestick as a normal candlestick.
Third, what does "upward," "downward," etc., really mean? This is the key to truly understanding the trend.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeLady
· 01-02 09:55
honestly this geometric logic hits different when you actually need it in production—none of that theoretical fluff matters until candles start doing weird containment stuff and you're sitting there watching gwei spike while trying to time the optimal window... the transitive property trap tho? chef's kiss disaster waiting to happen lmao
Reply0
WenMoon42
· 01-02 09:52
The geometric logic set is indeed powerful, but most people still get stuck on the containment relationship.
---
I've stepped on the trap of the transmission law before. In steps 1 and 2, there's containment; in steps 2 and 3, there's also containment. As a result, I thought 1 and 3 must have it... Wake up, that's not how it works.
---
Honestly, the most popular statement is that basic definitions are truly valuable. Only during actual trading and backtesting do you realize this.
---
The definitions of upward and downward are the real ceiling; it's pointless to understand them without clarity.
---
That set of [maxdi, maxgi]... Ah, so that's compressing n candlesticks into one. No wonder the trend is so captivating.
---
The law of combination is fine, but the transmission law fails. This logic in the Chen theory design is quite brilliant.
---
It sounds good, but in actual trading, you still rely on market feel... But it’s indeed reasonable.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 01-02 09:51
Geometry logic makes sense, but I've fallen into the trap of the transitive law in the inclusion relationship many times...
View OriginalReply0
Blockblind
· 01-02 09:42
This logic sounds correct, but in reality, it's still easy to get caught off guard... The transmission law part is indeed prone to pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 01-02 09:37
The breaking of the Wei Chan theory is essentially geometry + logic. The real challenge is applying it effectively in the market.
Regarding the inclusion relationship, I used to be stuck on this before. Looking back now, I realize that simply memorizing formulas is useless; you need to thoroughly understand that way of thinking.
Wait, the fact that the transitive law doesn't always hold is interesting. Does that mean we can't infer things arbitrarily? We need to proceed step by step, right?
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegen
· 01-02 09:25
ngl ser, this geometry logic thing sounds clean on paper but like... have i actually made money using it? absolutely not, still down bad checking floor prices at 3am lol. probably nothing though, definitely aping in on the next breakout fr fr
Creating chart analysis, in simple terms, is a set of geometric logic. To truly understand it, you need to start from the most basic definitions—this may sound like old advice, but it’s actually the most practical in real trading. No matter how complex the trend, returning to fundamental definitions reveals that it’s not so mysterious after all.
The most common stumbling block in pattern analysis is simply the containment relationship between candlesticks. But as long as you understand geometric thinking, some inferences will naturally come to light:
First, use [di, gi] to mark the interval formed by the lowest and highest prices of the i-th candlestick. When breaking upward, a sequence of n consecutive candlesticks with containment relationships is equivalent to the single candlestick corresponding to the interval [maxdi, maxgi]. In other words, these n candlesticks and the candlestick that contains both their highest and lowest points are essentially the same. The downward trend is the reverse, corresponding to the interval [mindi, mingi].
Second, the associative law is the foundation of Chanlun. The analysis of candlestick containment relationships must also follow this law. But here’s a pitfall: containment relationships do not satisfy the transitive law. If candlestick 1 and 2 contain each other, and candlestick 2 and 3 contain each other, it does not mean candlestick 1 and 3 contain each other. Therefore, analysis must be done in sequence: first, determine the containment relationship between candlesticks 1 and 2 to generate a new candlestick; then compare this new candlestick with candlestick 3—if they contain each other, continue combining; if not, treat the new candlestick as a normal candlestick.
Third, what does "upward," "downward," etc., really mean? This is the key to truly understanding the trend.