#Strategy加码BTC配置 says what about the death cross, these people really haven't thought it through.
A 10-week moving average crossing the 50-week moving average means a 50% drop? The historical pattern is right there, and these so-called forecasters are just using old tricks to predict now. But the question is—are we still in the same market? Clearly not.
Institutions like BlackRock and Fidelity, holding millions of $BTC in spot ETFs, are they using it as toys to dump? No, they call this strategic core holdings. The scale of their positions is unprecedented in crypto history. With so many giant players deeply intertwined, the market’s resilience has completely changed.
Looking at the fundamentals—having endured the high-interest-rate environment of the past two years, the leveraged positions that were destined to fail have already been squeezed out. The current market leverage isn’t nearly as exaggerated. Want to recreate a chain reaction of liquidations? You lack the explosive trigger. The same logic applies to $ETH, $SOL, and others.
The most painful part is that the list of participants in this crash has changed—it’s no longer just retail investors and small funds fighting each other, but institutions are also caught in it. Big institutions want to cut losses, but they have to admit defeat first, and no one can afford that cost. So if something really goes wrong, it will be the institutions that move first, giving us some reaction time.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PuzzledScholar
· 17h ago
The reasoning is rough but not wrong; this wave of institutional entry has indeed changed the game rules, and retail investors will have to join in to reap the benefits.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 01-03 16:08
Really, this wave of institutional entry has changed the game, and retail investors' old predictions and routines should have been discarded long ago.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 01-03 11:32
I believe in the institutions holding the chips. But to be honest, no one should be overly confident in this round; missing out is more painful than a sharp decline.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibes
· 01-02 09:40
That's right, the institutions' core holdings this time are indeed different.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 01-02 09:39
This logic indeed has no flaws. The concept of death cross is truly outdated. Once the institutional chips are laid out, the game rules change.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 01-02 09:25
BlackRock and Fidelity hold millions of coins, dumping? Laughing out loud, these institutions will definitely give us signals when they move, they are not afraid at all.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketTeam
· 01-02 09:24
This time, the market logic has been thoroughly corrected. The old calendar of death cross definitely should be retired. The heavy positions held by institutions have completely changed the game rules.
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachine
· 01-02 09:23
BlackRock and Fidelity have really changed the game this time. Retail investors are still watching the death cross, while institutions have already bet on the bottom.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 01-02 09:19
Institutions holding millions of BTC really wouldn't dump the market; that logic doesn't hold up.
Too many people are talking about a death cross, but the historical patterns just don't work in today's market.
When institutions enter, it's usually at the bottom; retail investors' reaction time is actually our biggest advantage.
#Strategy加码BTC配置 says what about the death cross, these people really haven't thought it through.
A 10-week moving average crossing the 50-week moving average means a 50% drop? The historical pattern is right there, and these so-called forecasters are just using old tricks to predict now. But the question is—are we still in the same market? Clearly not.
Institutions like BlackRock and Fidelity, holding millions of $BTC in spot ETFs, are they using it as toys to dump? No, they call this strategic core holdings. The scale of their positions is unprecedented in crypto history. With so many giant players deeply intertwined, the market’s resilience has completely changed.
Looking at the fundamentals—having endured the high-interest-rate environment of the past two years, the leveraged positions that were destined to fail have already been squeezed out. The current market leverage isn’t nearly as exaggerated. Want to recreate a chain reaction of liquidations? You lack the explosive trigger. The same logic applies to $ETH, $SOL, and others.
The most painful part is that the list of participants in this crash has changed—it’s no longer just retail investors and small funds fighting each other, but institutions are also caught in it. Big institutions want to cut losses, but they have to admit defeat first, and no one can afford that cost. So if something really goes wrong, it will be the institutions that move first, giving us some reaction time.