#以太坊行情解读 Current Situation Briefing | Wallet Malicious Address Interception Feature Launch: A New Phase in User Asset Protection



The security protection of crypto wallets has always been a challenging issue. Recently, industry voices have pointed out that the entire sector should take action—enabling wallet software to identify and intercept high-risk addresses before transfers, directly protecting users from scams.

To be more specific, a leading exchange's wallet has already implemented an automatic recognition feature. If you try to send money to a suspicious address, the system will immediately pop up a warning. It sounds simple, but behind the scenes, it requires wallets and security teams to maintain a real-time updated blacklist database of confirmed scam addresses.

Another noteworthy direction is optimizing wallet UI—those trivial small transaction records don't need to clutter the homepage; a cleaner interface can actually reduce misoperations.

From a user perspective, such feature upgrades can indeed help novice traders avoid risks. But the real challenge is that exchanges are in competition with each other—building a unified, real-time updated industry-wide blacklist system is no easy task. Different wallets have inconsistent technical standards, and their willingness to share information may vary.

Perhaps a more practical approach is: leading wallets first improve their own recognition capabilities, and other products will naturally follow once they see the results. Security is always about adding an extra layer of protection—it's never a bad thing. The key is to move beyond mere verbal promises; real implementation is what will earn user trust.
ETH-0,86%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TommyTeacher1vip
· 2025-12-27 08:51
Blacklisting needs to be coordinated among all exchanges; otherwise, it's just a show.
View OriginalReply0
DYORMastervip
· 2025-12-24 14:01
Looks good, but can the blacklist system really keep up with the speed of scam teams? It still feels like some will slip through the cracks.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoervip
· 2025-12-24 12:38
Uh, it's the same old blacklist database... To put it nicely, in reality, everyone still does their own thing.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSellervip
· 2025-12-24 12:36
Can the blacklist database update speed keep up with new scam techniques? That's the real issue.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainArchaeologistvip
· 2025-12-24 12:18
No matter how much the blacklist database is improved, it can't keep up with new scams that are constantly evolving every day. Ultimately, it still depends on users to be more vigilant.
View OriginalReply0
NullWhisperervip
· 2025-12-24 12:12
blacklist maintenance is the real bottleneck here tbh. everyone talks about it but nobody wants to share data cross-exchange... the competitive angle kills it every time.
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)