$BTC This leaderboard for the human vs. AI showdown is really interesting. In the end, AI topped the chart, but honestly, the trader who ranked second also showed real skill—being able to reach this position among many contestants is no joke.



The data is right here, clear as day: overall human ROI dropped by 32.21%, while AI only declined by 4.48%. Such a big gap is not without reason. The reason AI remains stable is mainly because it stays rational—leverage strategies are consistently steady, holding positions when needed and never messing around. What about human traders? Emotions are the number one killer. When the market fluctuates slightly, they start adjusting leverage and positions frequently, and such high-frequency operations often lead to self-sabotage.

But to be fair, achieving such results among human traders already proves what true skill looks like. Trading logic for hot coins like $SOL isn’t simple; those who can control their emotions and stick to their strategies really stand out. This showdown actually reminds everyone of a simple but often forgotten truth: in the market, those who make money are never the players driven by emotions, but those who can keep a steady mindset and execute according to plan.
BTC1,91%
SOL5,05%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
just_vibin_onchainvip
· 2025-12-26 14:54
To be honest, AI winning is just winning, but that guy in second place is really impressive. Emotional management is truly a watershed moment.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 2025-12-25 07:56
To be honest, the guy in second place is really tough; as long as his emotions didn't collapse, he already had half the victory.
View OriginalReply0
HappyMinerUnclevip
· 2025-12-24 20:35
To be honest, it's no surprise that AI won, but that guy in second place really has some skills. His emotional management truly outperforms most retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
GhostChainLoyalistvip
· 2025-12-24 09:57
Really, the second-place trader's performance is truly outstanding. Not everyone can hold up under this kind of pressure.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58vip
· 2025-12-24 09:52
Damn, it's one thing that AI won, but the key is that guy still stayed so steady in second place. He's really got some skills.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAOvip
· 2025-12-24 09:39
In plain terms, this is an issue of incentive distortion—AI has no emotional costs, while humans have to expend a lot of cognitive resources just to withstand psychological pressure, which is inherently unfair. But look, the few people who manage to emerge from this unequal game have actually revealed that the essence of trading is institutional self-discipline, similar to governance with checks and balances of interests, relying on internal mechanisms to restrain oneself. Most people can't even do this, so what is there to say about resisting AI?
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMinervip
· 2025-12-24 09:34
Basically, emotions are the most expensive tuition fees. This guy really held it together as the second place.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)