The Snowball technology itself is indeed valuable, and the coins built on it can provide value back to the Snowball ecosystem. However, this does not mean that projects using Snowball technology can only become supporting characters.
The reality is more complex. A project with a strong community or topic effect, even if based on existing technological frameworks, can completely carve out its own market space. The competition between ecosystems is not an either-or situation; it is more about mutual empowerment—technology providers benefit from the verification of more application scenarios, while project parties gain mature infrastructure.
The key still lies in the innovation and execution of the project itself. Good technology combined with a good team and a good story is the formula for a breakout.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainDecoder
· 18h ago
This trap argument has indeed been empirically tested. From an ecological perspective, parasitism is not equal to symbiosis; the key is who seizes the discourse power at the moment of value creation.
That said, how many times has the formula "good technology paired with a good team paired with a good story" failed verification in 2023? The data shows that the success probability is actually much lower than market expectations.
However, to return to the point, from the perspective of technical architecture, the openness of the infrastructure layer does indeed determine the ceiling of upper-layer applications, and this is worth discussing in depth.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivor
· 18h ago
To put it simply, it depends on whether the team is reliable; no matter how good the technology is, it's useless without execution.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 18h ago
Technology is just the foundation; what truly determines life and death is the team and narrative ability. Throughout history, how many "me too" projects ended up achieving great things?
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStruggler
· 19h ago
The usability of technology ultimately depends on who is using it. With a story and a community, even an old framework can yield results.
View OriginalReply0
StillBuyingTheDip
· 19h ago
Technology is just the foundation; the key is whether the team can tell a good story.
The Snowball technology itself is indeed valuable, and the coins built on it can provide value back to the Snowball ecosystem. However, this does not mean that projects using Snowball technology can only become supporting characters.
The reality is more complex. A project with a strong community or topic effect, even if based on existing technological frameworks, can completely carve out its own market space. The competition between ecosystems is not an either-or situation; it is more about mutual empowerment—technology providers benefit from the verification of more application scenarios, while project parties gain mature infrastructure.
The key still lies in the innovation and execution of the project itself. Good technology combined with a good team and a good story is the formula for a breakout.