In recent days, the performance of AAVE has been a bit weak, with prices continuously pulling back. The logic behind this is actually quite worth pondering. Large Investors are intensively dumping at this point in time, and the core reason points to internal power disputes within the DAO— the Labs team directly transferred 10 million in profits without obtaining community Consensus, claiming this was their deserved reward. However, from the community's perspective, this money is essentially a collective asset accumulated by the ecosystem.



The conflict has further escalated, with TAO attempting to reclaim brand-related resources of AAVE, including core digital assets such as domain names and social media accounts. It appears to be an internal power struggle, but it actually exposes a difficult issue that cannot be circumvented in the DeFi ecosystem: when a project shouts the slogan of "decentralization," the actual control of the brand is still held by a specific team.

The impact of this matter is broader than it appears on the surface. The selling off by large investors indicates doubts about the stability of DAO governance in the market. A deeper anxiety lies in the fact that similar power struggles are almost inevitable in future DeFi projects. The brand resources controlled by Labs are indeed key assets for the project, but since a decentralized governance framework has been chosen, why has the control over these strategic resources been undermined? This paradox is becoming a systemic challenge faced by the entire DAO model.

In terms of market conditions, after a series of slight increases, it has entered a consolidation phase, which basically meets expectations. However, there is an interesting phenomenon: in such a poor liquidity market environment, there has surprisingly been no extreme plunge, which somewhat indicates that there are large investors secretly accumulating positions to stabilize the situation. In the short term, the possibility of a sharp decline exists, but it may not happen immediately. If AAVE really experiences a significant drop, it could instead become an entry opportunity for some.
AAVE1,17%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StakeOrRegretvip
· 6h ago
It's another internal split, really fucking ironic. The Labs team secretly took 10 million and still dares to call it a reward. This is Web3, everyone. It's normal for big players to run away; DAO governance is just like this. We've been shouting about decentralization for so long, but in the end, it's still the same old story. Wait for the dip; it will be cheaper.
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larryvip
· 12-23 11:55
The Labs team is really arrogant, directly transferring 10 million and still calling it a reward? It's time to wake up from this dream of Decentralization. --- Both the domain and the account are to be fought over. To put it bluntly, it's still the centralization model; just shouting a slogan is enough. --- The exit of Large Investors really highlights the issue; DAO governance has truly stalled. --- Interestingly, there hasn't been a Plummet, which indicates that someone is catching a falling knife at the bottom, waiting for a Rebound. --- This AAVE matter is actually a joke; in the end, Decentralization is still held by a few people who control the fate line. --- There may not be a big dump in the short term, but if you ask me, this is the last opportunity to enter a position. --- It's ridiculous to talk about governance when the control over brand resources has been undermined; I can't believe this paradox. --- The market maker is Accumulating, right? I see it more likely that it's the last wave of Cut Loss for the dumb buyers. --- This Liquidity is like pulp, and it's surprisingly stable; either there is large capital for Market Stabilization or it will fall.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomadvip
· 12-23 11:49
ngl this whole aave labs drama is giving major bridge exploit postmortem vibes... when you think governance is decentralized but actually it's just trust assumptions wearing a dao mask
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)