There is an interesting phenomenon worth discussing. Taking PIPPIN as an example, when short positions accumulate to a certain level, the funding rate is tightly suppressed, which directly limits the project team's ability to push the price up—because a one-sided market needs time to digest these short positions. Sounds familiar? Many projects launched on major exchange contracts operate this way.
Ultimately, the funding rate becomes the project's "lifeline." Regardless of whether the coin price rises or falls, they can profit from the rate difference. This logic has become a semi-public secret. Some people want to improve this mechanism, but upon careful thought, you realize—this is equivalent to cutting off the project's financial resources. How could they be willing? The entire ecosystem has long adapted to this balance; changing it would instead break the current "harmony." This is the true operation of the market.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FundingMartyr
· 12-22 12:52
Damn, this is the reason we get played for suckers every day, the funding rate has become the project party's ATM
---
After all this time, the project party doesn't care about the coin price at all, they just rely on sucking funding rates to survive
---
No wonder the exchange is so eager to list new coins, this business is really profitable
---
Change the mechanism? Laughable, who would be stupid enough to move the cheese
---
So retail investors should just accept the predetermined rules of the game, it's really despairing
---
This system is already a half-open secret, yet there are still people who can't see through it
---
Lowering the funding rate is paving the way for the upcoming pump, it's instant
---
The problem is we still have to trade here, no choice.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuilder
· 12-21 14:52
In plain terms, the funding rate has become the project party's printing press; whoever dares to touch it will die.
View OriginalReply0
我只想睡觉
· 12-20 14:52
I've paid quite a bit of tuition fees and have seen through it early on. I've made more than two trades, each earning a few hundred dollars, and then I ran away. Occasionally, I come back to take a look.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 12-20 14:44
This trick has been played out, and I've seen through it long ago. The project team profits from the fee rate difference, retail investors become the little guys, who dares to touch this cake.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholar
· 12-20 14:35
This strategy is so deep, the funding rate has become a cash machine for project teams. Anyone who dares to move is breaking the rules of the game.
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 12-20 14:30
Damn, that's why PIPPIN has been stuck in that awkward sideways movement. Turns out, the fee rate is the real boss.
There is an interesting phenomenon worth discussing. Taking PIPPIN as an example, when short positions accumulate to a certain level, the funding rate is tightly suppressed, which directly limits the project team's ability to push the price up—because a one-sided market needs time to digest these short positions. Sounds familiar? Many projects launched on major exchange contracts operate this way.
Ultimately, the funding rate becomes the project's "lifeline." Regardless of whether the coin price rises or falls, they can profit from the rate difference. This logic has become a semi-public secret. Some people want to improve this mechanism, but upon careful thought, you realize—this is equivalent to cutting off the project's financial resources. How could they be willing? The entire ecosystem has long adapted to this balance; changing it would instead break the current "harmony." This is the true operation of the market.