The Political Crisis of Cryptocurrency Policy: The Dilemma of Market Fairness and Industry Influence

TokenomicsTrapper · 2025-12-18T23:00:14+00:00

Recently, the crypto community has been intensely discussing U.S. crypto policies, criticizing certain government measures for politicizing industry issues and blurring the line between policy and personal interests. There are concerns that including specific crypto assets in strategic reserves could distort the market and impact ecological fairness. Meanwhile, critics who express dissatisfaction are being excluded, reflecting that industry participants choose to remain silent to maintain political influence, which is detrimental to industry development.

TokenomicsTrapper

2025-12-18 23:00:14

Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】Recently, the crypto community has been discussing U.S. crypto policies. Some industry insiders point out that certain government initiatives in the crypto space have issues—including the launch of specific themed tokens and so-called “financial freedom” plans. Such practices risk politicizing industry problems and directly undermine the existing bipartisan regulatory cooperation.

Even more concerning are the policy boundary issues. When policymakers promote the inclusion of specific crypto assets into strategic reserves, the line between policy and personal interests becomes blurred. This provides opponents with ample public opinion ammunition before 2026.

Regarding the so-called “strategic reserve expansion” plan, there are concerns: once the government chooses certain tokens (such as tokens from specific projects) as reserve assets, the risk of market distortion becomes very real. This is no small matter—it directly impacts the ecological fairness of projects like Bitcoin and Cardano.

Interestingly, industry insiders reveal that after raising these criticisms, they were disinvited from related meetings. This reflects a deeper dilemma: to maintain political influence, industry participants are often forced to remain silent. This is not beneficial for the long-term healthy development of the crypto industry.

BTC0,99%

ADA2,32%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

potentially_notable

· 2025-12-21 22:57

Political players are causing trouble again, it's really annoying. Grabbing regulation with one hand and Cryptocurrency Trading with the other, this operation is incredible.

View OriginalReply0

StableGeniusDegen

· 2025-12-19 08:53

The government is meddling in politics, what voice does our community still have... It's so ironic.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 2025-12-18 23:29

When losing money, it's most important to stay clear-headed. This wave of political game-playing is actually building momentum for real opportunities. The influence gained through silence is ultimately虚的, and it instead allows dishonest voices to take the stage. This is the biggest risk. After such a long decline, it's time to think from a different perspective: the true bottom is when the entire industry chooses to compromise. Here we go again, politicized market distortions. Do we need to relive the lessons from last year? Faith can't just be written in your wallet; it must be reflected in your voice. Otherwise, everything is just a mirage. The bottom range is amidst this chaos. Only those who can withstand the pressure and speak out deserve to grasp the future. Having experienced the halving in 2018, this policy turbulence is really not the scariest part. The scariest part is that we surrendered first. The moment fairness is broken, is the moment we need to stand up. No one should expect me to continue playing deaf and mute.

View OriginalReply0

SorryRugPulled

· 2025-12-18 23:28

Hi... once again using the "strategic reserve" trick. Basically, they just want to cut our leeks. They claim to be politically neutral, but behind the scenes they are opening backdoors for certain cryptocurrencies. That's outrageous. It's really ironic. Those who dare to speak out are kicked out, and the rest are just pretending to be deaf and mute to keep their jobs... Forget it, don't expect these people to speak up anymore.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 2025-12-18 23:26

actually, the real arbitrage here is watching everyone stay silent while the basis widens. if govs are picking winners, that's just worse slippage than any dex ever gave us. and honestly? people choosing politics over principle? that's a -500bps decision for the entire ecosystem. mathematically speaking, this ends badly.

Reply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 2025-12-18 23:12

Oh my, politics and the crypto world really are a mess when mixed together. --- Here we go again, everyone wants to make specific coins part of their reserves... Isn't that just a disguised way of harvesting profits? --- Speaking the truth gets you ostracized, how is this ecosystem supposed to grow? --- Those who remain silent and seek peace should reflect on themselves; sometimes you just have to make a fuss. --- The strategic reserve system should have been exposed long ago. Are we only waking up now? --- The key issue is that the big players are scared; they just want to keep their jobs and avoid trouble. --- Political manipulation of the crypto world—someone needs to stand up and say this can't go on. --- I just want to ask, why must certain assets receive "special treatment"? --- Fairness in the ecosystem? That word is a joke in the face of politics.

View OriginalReply0