【Crypto World】SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce issued an important statement on December 17, announcing the launch of the latest FAQ in collaboration with the Trading and Markets Division, widely soliciting market opinions on the applicable rules for national securities exchanges (NSE) and alternative trading systems (ATS) in cryptocurrency asset trading.
The focus of this statement is very clear: how to handle the specific trading and clearing arrangements for crypto asset securities and “security—non-security crypto asset” trading pairs. Peirce admitted that SEC staff are ready to work closely with market participants to promote compliant trading pairs on legitimate platforms. She pointed out that the market is in urgent need of a clearer market structure rule system that protects investors, maintains market order, and does not impose excessive regulatory burdens on innovation. Especially, the two old rules introduced in 1998—Regulation ATS and Regulation NMS—are somewhat out of sync when it comes to crypto assets and blockchain technology.
The issues involved in this solicitation are quite specific. First, how to lower platform access barriers and encourage innovation; second, whether the current Reg NMS and Reg ATS impose disproportionate compliance costs on crypto trading. There is also a discussion on whether to create a separate Form ATS for crypto ATS or to adjust the existing disclosure system. Should crypto ATS information disclosure remain non-public, or should SEC review and public mechanisms be introduced? Given the traceability of blockchain data, is the quarterly reporting requirement for Form ATS-R still necessary? Is there a clear compliance method for converting non-USD assets into USD? How to handle requirements such as trade information confidentiality, system risk control, and system compliance to ensure security without hindering individual developers or the use of automated trading tools.
Peirce emphasized that these issues will directly impact the SEC crypto working group’s subsequent policy development. The regulatory agency also sincerely invites broader suggestions, aiming to improve the overall regulatory framework for NSE and ATS. The market generally interprets this statement as a relatively open signal from SEC internally regarding reforms to the crypto asset trading market structure, conveying a willingness to find a balance between innovation and regulation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWaster
· 12-19 22:32
Peirce finally didn't make people wait in vain this time. It's rare for the SEC to have someone figure things out... But as they say, good words are easy to say; the real test is in how it's implemented.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 12-19 11:07
It sounds like Peirce really wants to loosen up this time, but then again, how many times have we heard the SEC's rhetoric... Every time they say they want to support innovation, but in the end, it's just a bunch of rules that confuse people.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 12-18 01:09
Peirce has really had an epiphany this time... Finally, someone in the SEC is speaking human language, not sticking to the rigid regulatory approach.
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinator
· 12-18 00:59
Peirce is really just blowing smoke this time, "Preparing for deep cooperation" sounds sweet but there's no concrete plan at all.
Emm, to put it simply, we still have to wait, what can the SEC's FAQ change...
But speaking of which, using rules from 1998 to regulate today's crypto is indeed a bit ridiculous.
Finally, someone in the SEC is speaking reasonably, although it's still the old investor protection routine, but at least the attitude isn't outright dismissive.
The lack of a clear timetable is really frustrating; the market needs action, not more consultations.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461
· 12-18 00:55
Peirce is really a breath of fresh air in the crypto circle. Finally, someone dares to say that regulation can't completely stifle innovation.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTears
· 12-18 00:48
Haha, Peirce finally said something sensible, but can this FAQ really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 12-18 00:46
finally someone at SEC talking sense about market structure. been watching order book depth correlations between CEX and ATS platforms—if they actually streamline these regs, the basis points on sec-token pairs could get interesting. not holding my breath though, regulatory arbitrage opportunities rarely last long once they get documented.
SEC adopts a more open attitude towards adjusting cryptocurrency trading rules, with Peirce voicing support for regulatory innovation
【Crypto World】SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce issued an important statement on December 17, announcing the launch of the latest FAQ in collaboration with the Trading and Markets Division, widely soliciting market opinions on the applicable rules for national securities exchanges (NSE) and alternative trading systems (ATS) in cryptocurrency asset trading.
The focus of this statement is very clear: how to handle the specific trading and clearing arrangements for crypto asset securities and “security—non-security crypto asset” trading pairs. Peirce admitted that SEC staff are ready to work closely with market participants to promote compliant trading pairs on legitimate platforms. She pointed out that the market is in urgent need of a clearer market structure rule system that protects investors, maintains market order, and does not impose excessive regulatory burdens on innovation. Especially, the two old rules introduced in 1998—Regulation ATS and Regulation NMS—are somewhat out of sync when it comes to crypto assets and blockchain technology.
The issues involved in this solicitation are quite specific. First, how to lower platform access barriers and encourage innovation; second, whether the current Reg NMS and Reg ATS impose disproportionate compliance costs on crypto trading. There is also a discussion on whether to create a separate Form ATS for crypto ATS or to adjust the existing disclosure system. Should crypto ATS information disclosure remain non-public, or should SEC review and public mechanisms be introduced? Given the traceability of blockchain data, is the quarterly reporting requirement for Form ATS-R still necessary? Is there a clear compliance method for converting non-USD assets into USD? How to handle requirements such as trade information confidentiality, system risk control, and system compliance to ensure security without hindering individual developers or the use of automated trading tools.
Peirce emphasized that these issues will directly impact the SEC crypto working group’s subsequent policy development. The regulatory agency also sincerely invites broader suggestions, aiming to improve the overall regulatory framework for NSE and ATS. The market generally interprets this statement as a relatively open signal from SEC internally regarding reforms to the crypto asset trading market structure, conveying a willingness to find a balance between innovation and regulation.