There's something darkly funny about building on platforms designed to advance cutting-edge AI while everyone debates whether the tech itself is a threat. The contradiction is pretty obvious once you sit with it.
Pushing these innovations forward? Yeah, it's non-stop work. Had to do it. Still doing it. But people aren't sold—they see the risk before they see the potential. Some dismiss it outright, others are skeptical but listening. That's the game though. The infrastructure gets built, the narrative evolves, and eventually adoption follows.
The irony isn't lost on anyone paying attention.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DisillusiionOracle
· 12-18 14:49
Haha, honestly, this is modern magical realism—building infrastructure while questioning the infrastructure itself.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroup
· 12-18 01:41
ngl this is the current state of Web3—on one hand, Schrödinger's risk theory, on the other hand, all in on infrastructure. Anyway, in the end, you'll have to use it; the gap in understanding is money.
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBounce
· 12-18 00:47
Honestly, humans are always like this—fearful of AI threats while rushing to get on board. The fate of the bag-holder is that someone will always be kidnapped by the narrative.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 12-16 01:53
Basically, it's like dancing on the edge of a knife—building while being criticized. Anyway, the infrastructure will be laid sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollector
· 12-16 01:53
While the AI threat theory is overwhelming, still crazily building, truly desperate...
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 12-16 01:51
ngl, this is just pouring gasoline on the fire... On one hand, they're working so hard to develop AI, and on the other hand, people are pointing fingers saying AI is a threat. Does that feel good or not?
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon42
· 12-16 01:50
NGL, this contradiction is really something... Building furiously on one hand while being questioned if you're shooting yourself in the foot on the other.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 12-16 01:50
Lol, this is the current state of Web3. Building while debating, once the infrastructure is in place, the narrative will follow.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 12-16 01:37
ngl this is a classic case of Schrödinger's innovation—being afraid and using it at the same time, pretty ironic, huh
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 12-16 01:35
Honestly, this is a typical narrative game... Infrastructure first, consensus follows, early participants have already left footprints on the chain.
There's something darkly funny about building on platforms designed to advance cutting-edge AI while everyone debates whether the tech itself is a threat. The contradiction is pretty obvious once you sit with it.
Pushing these innovations forward? Yeah, it's non-stop work. Had to do it. Still doing it. But people aren't sold—they see the risk before they see the potential. Some dismiss it outright, others are skeptical but listening. That's the game though. The infrastructure gets built, the narrative evolves, and eventually adoption follows.
The irony isn't lost on anyone paying attention.