#美联储降息 The short-term impact and subsequent rhythm of BTC during the Japanese rate hike cycle



From the perspective of capital flow and market dynamics, Japan's interest rate hike will exert short-term emotional pressure on risk assets. Bitcoin may experience a wave of shakeout-like volatility:

First, it will dip to the 86,000–87,000 range, completing a round of long liquidation. During this process, there will be "false breakouts" that reinforce bearish sentiment. Then, the price will quickly rebound above 90,000, even pushing toward the resistance levels of 100,000 and 106,000—this is actually a typical short squeeze behavior. When short positions in the market are overly concentrated, a rapid price increase will trigger a large number of stop-loss orders, which in turn accelerates the upward momentum.

Looking ahead, $BTC may enter a wide-range oscillation between 78,000 and 118,000, for several reasons:

First, the structure of capital is changing. Earlier, the bull market was mainly driven by "production cuts + retail investor influx." Now, institutional funds and sovereign wealth funds are starting to enter, and their approach is different—they prefer "positioning within ranges" rather than continuous unilateral upward pushes.

Second, market sentiment needs to be rebalanced. When prices rise to high levels that most people dare not short, profit-taking will occur, and some funds may even reverse to short, creating a dilemma of oscillation between highs and lows. The logic of $ETH is similar.

In simple terms, this rate hike shock is essentially a shakeout opportunity. But after the shakeout, the market structure changes, shifting from a single-sided bull rhythm to a range-bound oscillation. Institutional funds are large and prefer steady allocations, which means there won't be any extreme unilateral trends in the future.
BTC-0.18%
ETH-0.57%
BNB-1.03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaNomadvip
· 12-18 04:10
It makes some sense; institutional entry has indeed changed the game rules. The days of retail investors' one-sided all-in bets are probably truly over.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdropvip
· 12-17 02:36
I've seen this short squeeze routine many times before; the key still depends on the rhythm of institutional entry. Is there a chance for a shakeout? Think about retail investors getting trapped again, haha. Between 8.6 and 11.8, I bet it won't break new highs; volatility is the real torment. Once institutional funds come in, retail investors are out of the picture. This cycle is destined to be mediocre.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeGazervip
· 12-15 15:57
Short squeeze analysis is spot on. The only concern is that retail investors might get caught off guard when the price hits 86,000 and gets hammered down before they can react, then it takes off again. Institutional entry truly changes the game. The thrill of one-sided rapid rise is gone. Shakeout, shakeout. Basically, it's still about cutting the leeks and finding the bottom.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWangvip
· 12-15 13:45
Institutions started with range-bound fluctuations as soon as they entered the market, while retail investors are still dreaming of 100,000. LOL
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63bvip
· 12-15 04:39
Oh no, it's that old trick of shaking out the weak hands again. As soon as institutions step in, the price starts oscillating within a range, while retail investors are still sleepwalking. But honestly, the wide range from 7.8 to 11.8 seems like it will last quite a while. So I'll wait for a fake breakout to buy the dip; after all, it's all about harvesting the retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
StakeHouseDirectorvip
· 12-15 04:38
Shakeout is just a shakeout; don't make it so complicated. Simply put, it's institutions accumulating positions. I've heard countless times about institutions changing their tactics, but in the end, it's still about watching the macro environment. I think this wave could drop to around 8.5, which would be pretty good. Don't overthink the range. Short squeezes sound nice in theory, but in reality, it's just the retail investors taking the fall. I choose to stay on the sidelines. From 7.8 to 11.8, that's a pretty big range. It essentially means nothing.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroRushCaptainvip
· 12-15 04:34
Is it another shakeout? Is this really a false breakout this time? I bet 5 months' worth of pancakes that it will drop straight to 80,000😅 Institutions are entering for steady allocation, so I guess retail investors like me just have to accept it, right? Let's just lie flat and wait for the range-bound oscillation, everyone. Every time they talk about a shakeout opportunity, I've already lost my underwear from the washing. Next time I hear that phrase, I'll just do the opposite.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWangvip
· 12-15 04:23
The phrase "washing the market" has been heard too many times. This time, let's see if it can really drop to 86,000 before talking. It feels like just a pretext to trap retail investors again. Institutions entering the market just cause volatility? I think it's still big players accumulating, while retail investors continue to buy in. That 86,000 level won't break; the real test is above 100,000. Don't just talk about fake breakouts.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrainvip
· 12-15 04:20
Sweeping manipulation, I'm tired of hearing this explanation. If institutional investors are really entering the market, why keep using so many fancy fake breakouts... --- If that move from 8.6 to 8.7 really crashes down, can the bears be fully fed, or will they be forced to cover again... --- Range-bound oscillation sounds comfortable, but retail investors are most easily hit with stop-losses in this kind of market. To put it plainly, it's an upgraded version of the leek farm mechanism. --- Institutional allocations sound stable, but I trust my own K-line analysis more. Let's wait and see. --- From a bullish rally to a sideways oscillation... So that previous surge was just superficial, otherwise why bother with the washout? --- Breaking through the psychological level of 100,000 is the key; everything else is nonsense. --- Concentrated short positions can indeed be forced to cover, but this logic doesn't really bring anything new to the table. --- The analysis seems pretty good, but it still feels like armchair quarterbacking after the fact.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)