Traditional Banking + Stablecoin Payments: Amina and Ripple's Cross-Border Clearing and Settlement Upgrade

【Crypto World】Ripple payment solution and Swiss Amina Bank have reached an interesting partnership — the latter will gain access to Ripple’s payment infrastructure. What does this mean? In simple terms, Amina can complete transaction settlements more efficiently and cheaply through this infrastructure.

The background is that Amina had already integrated Ripple USD stablecoin, and this cooperation deepens the relationship between both parties. For Amina, reducing the costs and friction of cross-border payments is key — after all, traditional bank cross-border transfers are expensive and slow. By connecting to Ripple’s payment infrastructure, Amina can better serve its crypto-native customer base and maintain a competitive edge.

This move reflects a broader trend: traditional financial institutions are beginning to seriously embrace stablecoins and blockchain payment tools to meet new market demands. As a relatively early adopter, Amina has found a promising path forward.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryingOldWalletvip
· 13h ago
Traditional banks can no longer hold back and are starting to latch onto Ripple Both stablecoins and blockchain, in simple terms, are just scared of us getting ahead Amina's move this time is basically following the trend and trying to see how to harvest the leeks next
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBrovip
· 13h ago
Traditional banks are really starting to wake up; if they don't play along with stablecoins, they might die on the beach.
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosophervip
· 13h ago
Traditional banks just can't sit still anymore and are starting to seriously use stablecoins. Ripple's move is quite clever—if CBDCs can't be handled, then shift towards stablecoins. Banks lowering costs sounds good, but actually passing the savings to users is another story. Why isn't this guy rushing to develop stablecoin payments? It's too slow. Wait, I haven't heard of this Amina bank... but since they're collaborating with Ripple, there must be something interesting. In less than two years, stablecoins have become a must-have topic in traditional finance. It's fascinating. This is exactly what RippleNet should be doing—much more reliable than those CBDC fantasies.
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaservip
· 13h ago
Traditional banks have finally woken up, but their pace is indeed a bit slow.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichHuntervip
· 13h ago
Traditional banks are finally starting to take stablecoins seriously, but I still want to see real trading volume data.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegenvip
· 13h ago
ngl ser this is lowkey the play... traditional banks finally realizing they're cooked if they don't integrate blockchain infrastructure. amina's probably gonna moon their transaction volumes fr fr
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)