Badge drops from Epoch 1 have been rolling out, and getting mine sparked some thoughts about how this project is handling incentives. The allocation reflects consistent participation—which honestly feels refreshing.
Epoch 2 launched smoothly with reward distributions extending through early January. But here's what caught my attention: the IWO structure actually seems to prioritize vesting duration over raw transaction speed. This is different. Instead of rewarding bot activity and rapid execution, it's favoring users who hold and commit longer.
That's the kind of mechanism that might actually filter out the noise. When faster trading doesn't equal better rewards, you get a different crowd participating. It shifts incentives from short-term gaming toward genuine engagement with the ecosystem.
Whether this approach sustains momentum through the next phases will be interesting to watch.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
quietly_staking
· 12-17 21:09
Finally, there's a project that doesn't give all the rewards to those bot traders. This vesting design is indeed quite clever.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 12-17 18:32
ngl, this vesting design is actually quite thoughtful. Finally, I see that the project team is serious about their work.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 12-17 06:16
I didn't expect them to really take this seriously. Is the lock-up period more valuable than speed? This can indeed drive away those bots.
View OriginalReply0
potentially_notable
· 12-14 21:56
Wow, it's finally not a mechanism where you can just lie back and win by spamming orders. It really feels different now.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 12-14 21:38
This design logic is really quite unconventional; finally seeing the project team not follow the trend of incentivizing order brushing.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 12-14 21:34
ngl, this vesting design is really interesting. Finally, a project is fighting back against the羊毛党.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 12-14 21:33
Wow, finally seeing a project that doesn’t rely on fast in and out tactics. This mechanism design is truly excellent.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMaster
· 12-14 21:29
Finally seeing a project that doesn't rely on the fast-forward and quick exit tactics; this vesting mechanism is truly comfortable.
Badge drops from Epoch 1 have been rolling out, and getting mine sparked some thoughts about how this project is handling incentives. The allocation reflects consistent participation—which honestly feels refreshing.
Epoch 2 launched smoothly with reward distributions extending through early January. But here's what caught my attention: the IWO structure actually seems to prioritize vesting duration over raw transaction speed. This is different. Instead of rewarding bot activity and rapid execution, it's favoring users who hold and commit longer.
That's the kind of mechanism that might actually filter out the noise. When faster trading doesn't equal better rewards, you get a different crowd participating. It shifts incentives from short-term gaming toward genuine engagement with the ecosystem.
Whether this approach sustains momentum through the next phases will be interesting to watch.