A deep dive into the token allocation of a certain emerging Web3 project reveals an intriguing logic behind the numbers. Community reserves hold a dominant advantage—nearly 45% of the supply is directly allocated to the community, a tilt that is not commonly seen in similar projects. Looking at other portions: public sales account for only 2%, institutional investors 17.5%, and the remaining is divided between the team and liquidity. This design logic is quite interesting. Is it intended to strengthen decentralization, or is there another deeper meaning? From the perspective of token distribution, how a project slices the pie often reflects its attitude toward ecosystem governance and long-term development. The high community weight means that future decision-making power and profit rights will be more dispersed. This is a good signal for players who want to participate.