This project's tokenomics model presents obvious risks. The data makes it clear—circulating supply is 16.6 billion tokens, with a current RMB valuation of 7 billion, while the official total supply cap is set at 24 billion. Even more concerning is that the project team retains unlimited minting rights, meaning the token could be diluted to the trillions or even quadrillions at any time. Under this mechanism, short-term trading might still profit from price differences, but if you plan to hold long-term? The risk is enormous. The existence of unlimited minting rights means your assets will be constantly diluted, making long-term returns questionable. Think carefully before participating; such projects are more suitable for short-term trading and not for long-term holdings.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatcher
· 21h ago
The unlimited issuance right is really clever, just wait to be diluted
---
Is this thing meant for long-term holding? No wonder you'll lose
---
Short-term trading is okay, don't dream of getting rich
---
Looking at the data makes me uncomfortable, the project team is ruthless
---
Trillions and hundreds of trillions of dilution are waiting, wake up everyone
---
Another classic tactic of "we reserve the right to issue more"
---
Long-term allocation? You must want your coins to become worthless
---
Honestly, it's just a scheme to harvest retail investors, nothing else
---
With such high liquidity, dare to hold long-term? Are you out of your mind?
---
Short-term gamble might be okay, don't be greedy
---
I won't say it outright, but these kinds of projects all play the same game
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictim
· 21h ago
Unlimited issuance? Isn't this just a harvesting machine
---
Another trick of "we reserve the right," I've seen through it long ago
---
Short-term profit-taking, long-term dilution to death, no other choice
---
166 billion circulation and still dare to issue infinitely, how disrespectful to retail investors
---
I think these projects should be labeled "High Risk Short Term," don't deceive people into holding long-term
---
Dilution to a trillion is not excessive, next step is ten trillion, they are all just numbers anyway
---
After seeing this data, I have only one sentence: If you touch it, you deserve it
---
The project team's tactics are really brilliant, a legitimate token slaughterhouse
---
So, are there still people willing to hold this long-term? Respect to you all
---
Unlimited issuance rights = unlimited dilution rights, this logic is sound, right
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKing
· 22h ago
Infinite issuance? Isn't this just blatantly harvesting the leeks?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivor
· 22h ago
Unlimited issuance? That's a ticking time bomb.
Holding onto this thing for the long term might make you regret it to death.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioning
· 22h ago
Unlimited issuance rights? Isn't that just a slow poison? To put it nicely, it's called "flexible supply"; to put it bluntly, it's a certificate for cutting leeks.
This project's tokenomics model presents obvious risks. The data makes it clear—circulating supply is 16.6 billion tokens, with a current RMB valuation of 7 billion, while the official total supply cap is set at 24 billion. Even more concerning is that the project team retains unlimited minting rights, meaning the token could be diluted to the trillions or even quadrillions at any time. Under this mechanism, short-term trading might still profit from price differences, but if you plan to hold long-term? The risk is enormous. The existence of unlimited minting rights means your assets will be constantly diluted, making long-term returns questionable. Think carefully before participating; such projects are more suitable for short-term trading and not for long-term holdings.