【CryptoWorld】The “Four-Year Cycle” of Bitcoin has not disappeared; only the driving forces have changed.
Looking at historical data makes it clear: in 2013, 2017, and 2021, Bitcoin reached all-time highs. Many people associate this cycle with halving events, but now the situation is much more complex.
This year, the Federal Reserve is cutting interest rates. Theoretically, easy liquidity should be beneficial for Bitcoin, but what’s the result? The price has not surged strongly. Why? The key is that institutional investors have become the market’s decision-makers. But these institutions are different from retail investors—they are more cautious and have longer decision-making chains.
The Federal Reserve’s policy signals are still uncertain, and overall liquidity remains tight, which naturally slows down the pace of institutional entry. Without sufficient capital to support the momentum, the price lacks the necessary energy to break through.
Therefore, in the short term, Bitcoin is more likely to fluctuate within a certain range, and sideways consolidation will continue. If you want to see a new parabolic surge, you’ll have to wait until the liquidity environment significantly improves.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForumMiningMaster
· 12-17 10:25
These institutional folks are really pointless, causing retail investors to just stare in disbelief.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 12-16 20:53
Institutions being cautious is just an excuse to set a trap for us retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDiver
· 12-16 14:51
Institutions really love to drag things out; retail investors have already rushed in.
---
Basically, it's just a lack of money to buy in; sideways trading is the norm.
---
Wait, can the halving still save us? It feels like the cycle thing is no longer effective.
---
Talking about four-year cycles during liquidity crunches is just laughable.
---
Institutional caution is just a facade; they're actually accumulating at low levels.
---
The Federal Reserve's policy signals are wavering; how can we expect the crypto market to stabilize?
---
Another sideways trend? These days, sideways trading has really become a routine operation.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 12-16 13:08
Institutions should be cautious, but my mining rigs don't care about that. Looking at the recent difficulty adjustment cycle, the current hash rate return is actually quite good, and the opportunity for low-cost entry is right in front of us.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardian
· 12-14 12:06
Institutions are taking it slow, while retail investors are getting anxious. This is the current situation.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivor
· 12-14 12:03
Institutions are cautious? Basically, everyone is just waiting for the best opportunity to harvest the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 12-14 12:02
The institutional guys have really taken control of the market, retail investors can only wait to get beaten.
View OriginalReply0
LightningPacketLoss
· 12-14 11:56
Institutions are cautious? To put it simply, they're just waiting for the right time to harvest the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 12-14 11:47
Institutions are still observing, while retail investors have already jumped in. That's why it's not as aggressive as expected.
Does the four-year cycle of Bitcoin still exist? A cautious attitude from institutions is the key
【CryptoWorld】The “Four-Year Cycle” of Bitcoin has not disappeared; only the driving forces have changed.
Looking at historical data makes it clear: in 2013, 2017, and 2021, Bitcoin reached all-time highs. Many people associate this cycle with halving events, but now the situation is much more complex.
This year, the Federal Reserve is cutting interest rates. Theoretically, easy liquidity should be beneficial for Bitcoin, but what’s the result? The price has not surged strongly. Why? The key is that institutional investors have become the market’s decision-makers. But these institutions are different from retail investors—they are more cautious and have longer decision-making chains.
The Federal Reserve’s policy signals are still uncertain, and overall liquidity remains tight, which naturally slows down the pace of institutional entry. Without sufficient capital to support the momentum, the price lacks the necessary energy to break through.
Therefore, in the short term, Bitcoin is more likely to fluctuate within a certain range, and sideways consolidation will continue. If you want to see a new parabolic surge, you’ll have to wait until the liquidity environment significantly improves.