The market has long shifted into a bear market, this is beyond doubt. After the Trump era, market liquidity was gradually drained, and the subsequent small rallies were at best just emotion-driven fake bull markets.
Altcoins have been burdened with heavy debt loads since the moment TGE was launched. The long-term holders who once stuck to their convictions have vanished, and dedicated developers have gradually exited. Instead, there are overwhelming airdrop hunters, VCs eager to cash out, exchange arbitrageurs, and project teams that invested for years and now want to recoup their costs—all running outward. Who is willing to be the last bag-holder?
MEME coins were once seen as a cure for traditional coins with high FDV. This wave indeed fulfilled its mission, providing retail investors with a new wealth path. But beneath the guise of zero technical barriers and “fair launch,” mass production on assembly lines cannot support long-term value. Losing the technological innovation stories from 0 to 1 that traditional coins rely on, the hype around MEME coins ultimately becomes internal battles of existing funds, inevitably leading to systemic erosion of the entire ecosystem.
Exchanges have always played a role in absorbing spillover effects from on-chain innovations and providing liquidity amplification. But when innovative platforms like Pumpfun, GMGN, and Hyperliquid emerged, demonstrating real wealth creation power, centralized exchanges felt threatened and launched their “internalization” rescue plans. The result was obvious—when shovel sellers started mining their own profits, the industry’s structural imbalance became inevitable.
For builders, these are the darkest times. Why are so many projects rushing to TGE? Why has the market lost patience for polishing products? Why are all the industry imbalances blamed on project teams and VCs? These questions are too complex; perhaps no one can answer them fully. But an undeniable fact is that builders and VCs in the crypto space are undergoing large-scale bankruptcies and fleeing. Even more terrifying than positions dropping to zero is the talent outflow and the industry being gutted from beneath.
Maybe this article sounds like a rant. But this is precisely why I emphasize on-chain technological innovation. Our crypto world has lost its former vitality—it’s sick, aging, and even deeply troubled.
The only salvation is waiting for the next rise of on-chain narratives driven by genuine technological innovation, which can breathe new life into everything.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityNinja
· 12-16 20:59
To be honest, this article hits the mark. We've seen through all this running around. Who still wants to take over now? It's all just a routine to cut leeks.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 12-16 02:13
Honestly, reading this article feels like looking in a mirror... Who has left and who is still here? I just can't understand how this round can still rebound.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 12-15 19:10
Honestly, right now all projects are bleeding, who still believes in long-term value...
Wait, did the MEME coin wave really give retail investors a chance? Or is it just another variation of harvesting profits?
Being a developer these days is really tough, with the ecosystem so rotten yet still blamed on the projects.
The issue of liquidity exhaustion should have been pointed out long ago. Just shouting slogans is useless.
So ultimately, the problem is that there’s no real innovation, just copying and pasting?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHunter
· 12-14 02:47
It's really heartbreaking. Right now, it's a big battle royale—everyone wants to run, no one wants to take the final baton.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumper
· 12-14 02:43
Everyone's running away, who would be willing to take over? Not wrong to say that, but those who are getting off this wave should have some bottom line.
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMaster
· 12-14 02:40
That's so heartbreaking. The crypto world is currently a big escape scene; everyone wants to run away.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 12-14 02:35
To be honest, I felt a bit of a rant when I read this article. The term "final bag-holder" is already so overused, I've heard it countless times over the past couple of years.
Airdrop hunters, venture capitalists cutting leeks, exchanges draining liquidity... they're all there. But the point is, the entire ecosystem is based on this logic. Why does it suddenly become a "problem"?
The part about MEME coins was quite hitting home. Fair launches have long been a joke.
Anyway, this is just how the bear market is. Don’t expect too much from anyone.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLady
· 12-14 02:24
ngl watching everyone panic sell while gwei spikes to 50+ hits different... nobody's timing the exits right anymore, just pure emotion-driven exits no technical setup whatsoever
Bear Market Dilemma and On-Chain Innovation: The Crypto Industry Needs a Tech-Driven Restart
The market has long shifted into a bear market, this is beyond doubt. After the Trump era, market liquidity was gradually drained, and the subsequent small rallies were at best just emotion-driven fake bull markets.
Altcoins have been burdened with heavy debt loads since the moment TGE was launched. The long-term holders who once stuck to their convictions have vanished, and dedicated developers have gradually exited. Instead, there are overwhelming airdrop hunters, VCs eager to cash out, exchange arbitrageurs, and project teams that invested for years and now want to recoup their costs—all running outward. Who is willing to be the last bag-holder?
MEME coins were once seen as a cure for traditional coins with high FDV. This wave indeed fulfilled its mission, providing retail investors with a new wealth path. But beneath the guise of zero technical barriers and “fair launch,” mass production on assembly lines cannot support long-term value. Losing the technological innovation stories from 0 to 1 that traditional coins rely on, the hype around MEME coins ultimately becomes internal battles of existing funds, inevitably leading to systemic erosion of the entire ecosystem.
Exchanges have always played a role in absorbing spillover effects from on-chain innovations and providing liquidity amplification. But when innovative platforms like Pumpfun, GMGN, and Hyperliquid emerged, demonstrating real wealth creation power, centralized exchanges felt threatened and launched their “internalization” rescue plans. The result was obvious—when shovel sellers started mining their own profits, the industry’s structural imbalance became inevitable.
For builders, these are the darkest times. Why are so many projects rushing to TGE? Why has the market lost patience for polishing products? Why are all the industry imbalances blamed on project teams and VCs? These questions are too complex; perhaps no one can answer them fully. But an undeniable fact is that builders and VCs in the crypto space are undergoing large-scale bankruptcies and fleeing. Even more terrifying than positions dropping to zero is the talent outflow and the industry being gutted from beneath.
Maybe this article sounds like a rant. But this is precisely why I emphasize on-chain technological innovation. Our crypto world has lost its former vitality—it’s sick, aging, and even deeply troubled.
The only salvation is waiting for the next rise of on-chain narratives driven by genuine technological innovation, which can breathe new life into everything.