[Crypto World] The Polish government has just re-approved the cryptocurrency asset law, sending a clear signal to President Karol Nawałka: sign it as soon as possible. This is not just a routine administrative procedure; behind it lies a key issue concerning the coordination of EU financial regulation.
Currently, the EU’s “Crypto Asset Regulatory Law” (MiCA) is an inevitable trend, requiring member states to establish a unified cryptocurrency asset regulatory framework. If Poland continues to delay, it will gradually fall out of sync with this framework, directly undermining effective regulation of the digital asset industry. The government’s warning is very straightforward—delays are unhelpful.
But the reality is much more complex. The president previously vetoed this bill, and the parliament subsequently attempted to overturn the veto, which resulted in failure. This rollercoaster reflects clear political disagreements within Poland regarding cryptocurrency asset regulation. From the government to the parliament and the president, the three parties have differing attitudes toward the bill.
The current situation is quite awkward: the EU’s MiCA framework is gradually improving, and countries are rushing to adapt their legal systems, but Poland has fallen into a deadlock. The longer the regulatory vacuum persists, the easier it becomes for unregulated digital asset activities to find gaps. For the entire Web3 ecosystem, a clear, unified, and internationally aligned regulatory environment is a long-term benefit. Whether Poland’s political tug-of-war can be resolved quickly remains to be seen.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProposalManiac
· 11h ago
The three-way tug-of-war in Poland is essentially a textbook case of mechanism design failure. Presidential veto → Parliament's failed override → Government re-approval, how long can this cycle go on?
Speaking of which, how many times in EU history has the "unified framework" like MiCA been attempted and then abandoned halfway through? The risk of delay is real, but no one has calculated the cost of hasty legislation.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThrice
· 14h ago
Poland is really causing trouble here. The president just won't give in.
Political game-playing, crypto regulation has also fallen victim. LOL.
MiCA should have been unified long ago, but they are still tearing each other apart internally...
The EU is getting anxious. If Poland keeps delaying, the entire framework will be affected.
The president is adamantly opposed, and the parliament can't push through either. Awkward.
If this continues, Poland will be excluded. Serves them right.
Can they make a decision quickly? Who can stand this constant messing around every day?
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStation
· 14h ago
It's the same gameplay again, EU is urging, Poland's internal conflicts, and in the end, retail investors waiting to jump in suffer.
Political disputes just hinder regulatory progress, and the implementation of MiCA is still far off.
The president contradicts the government, a classic case, let's wait and see for the follow-up reversal.
That presidential veto is essentially telling traditional finance, "We're not ready yet," haha.
Poland has truly become the choke point in the EU chain.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitor
· 14h ago
Poland is causing more trouble again, with the president, parliament, and government all playing their own roles... MiCA is almost rolled out, and they're still dragging their feet. They're really giving up.
Polish government pushes forward with crypto bill: EU MiCA regulation progress stalls
[Crypto World] The Polish government has just re-approved the cryptocurrency asset law, sending a clear signal to President Karol Nawałka: sign it as soon as possible. This is not just a routine administrative procedure; behind it lies a key issue concerning the coordination of EU financial regulation.
Currently, the EU’s “Crypto Asset Regulatory Law” (MiCA) is an inevitable trend, requiring member states to establish a unified cryptocurrency asset regulatory framework. If Poland continues to delay, it will gradually fall out of sync with this framework, directly undermining effective regulation of the digital asset industry. The government’s warning is very straightforward—delays are unhelpful.
But the reality is much more complex. The president previously vetoed this bill, and the parliament subsequently attempted to overturn the veto, which resulted in failure. This rollercoaster reflects clear political disagreements within Poland regarding cryptocurrency asset regulation. From the government to the parliament and the president, the three parties have differing attitudes toward the bill.
The current situation is quite awkward: the EU’s MiCA framework is gradually improving, and countries are rushing to adapt their legal systems, but Poland has fallen into a deadlock. The longer the regulatory vacuum persists, the easier it becomes for unregulated digital asset activities to find gaps. For the entire Web3 ecosystem, a clear, unified, and internationally aligned regulatory environment is a long-term benefit. Whether Poland’s political tug-of-war can be resolved quickly remains to be seen.