#美联储降息 【Bitcoin vs. Stablecoins: The Dual Engines of the Crypto Market】
The way digital assets are used is changing. In the past, everyone would go all-in on a single coin, but now some are considering how to effectively utilize two tools simultaneously: Bitcoin and stablecoins. This isn’t an either-or situation but a division of roles working together.
**The role of Bitcoin is clear: a long-term store of value**
It is the gold of the digital world. Its scarcity is assured, and its network security has stood the test of time. Volatility? That is normal for new assets and a price long-term holders must accept.
**Stablecoins, on the other hand, are the market’s circulating blood**
For example, some stablecoins pegged to purchasing power maintain stability through over-collateralization, aiming to become the mainstay in DeFi, daily transactions, and commercial settlements. One remains static while the other moves, complementing each other.
**How does this configuration work?**
Stablecoins unlock value within the Bitcoin ecosystem—your BTC doesn’t have to be sold; you can collateralize it to borrow stablecoins, maintaining your long-term exposure while participating in DeFi to generate yields. On the user level, it’s about: storing Bitcoin as a “security deposit,” using stablecoins as “daily pocket money,” completing a full cycle within the crypto ecosystem from savings to payments to income generation, truly reducing dependence on traditional finance.
Moreover, the value foundation of stablecoins can be anchored to the consensus around Bitcoin, which means increased trust in the entire system.
**The key question now is**: Between “long-term preservation of value” and “instant liquidity,” which is more likely to attract traditional capital first? Why?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainComedian
· 12h ago
Well, it sounds nice, but isn't it just trying to get us to lock up our coins and hold them hostage.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 12h ago
Haha, the term "Iron Gate" is really unique. How did I not think of that?
Traditional funds will definitely rush into stablecoins first, after all, people are afraid of volatility they don't understand.
This set of combined tactics is actually leveraging positions. The Federal Reserve's pace of rate cuts has really accelerated during this cycle.
Borrowing stablecoins against BTC collateral still carries risks; liquidation risk has been overlooked.
We're all playing this game, but the real liquidity is still on exchanges.
When the Federal Reserve cuts rates, the demand for stablecoins rises. This logic is sound.
The allocation theory sounds good, but in practice, there are many pitfalls.
Finally, someone has cut through it—simply HODLing Bitcoin is outdated.
It's nice to say it's about division of labor, but in reality, it's just risk hedging.
Stablecoins only become true winners when their scale grows; right now, it's still in the nascent stage.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 12h ago
Hmm, this combination sounds good, but the institutions actually entering the market are still watching and waiting.
View OriginalReply0
MelonField
· 12h ago
Oh, that's not right. Traditional funds still look at liquidity, and stablecoins are probably easier to accept.
#美联储降息 【Bitcoin vs. Stablecoins: The Dual Engines of the Crypto Market】
The way digital assets are used is changing. In the past, everyone would go all-in on a single coin, but now some are considering how to effectively utilize two tools simultaneously: Bitcoin and stablecoins. This isn’t an either-or situation but a division of roles working together.
**The role of Bitcoin is clear: a long-term store of value**
It is the gold of the digital world. Its scarcity is assured, and its network security has stood the test of time. Volatility? That is normal for new assets and a price long-term holders must accept.
**Stablecoins, on the other hand, are the market’s circulating blood**
For example, some stablecoins pegged to purchasing power maintain stability through over-collateralization, aiming to become the mainstay in DeFi, daily transactions, and commercial settlements. One remains static while the other moves, complementing each other.
**How does this configuration work?**
Stablecoins unlock value within the Bitcoin ecosystem—your BTC doesn’t have to be sold; you can collateralize it to borrow stablecoins, maintaining your long-term exposure while participating in DeFi to generate yields. On the user level, it’s about: storing Bitcoin as a “security deposit,” using stablecoins as “daily pocket money,” completing a full cycle within the crypto ecosystem from savings to payments to income generation, truly reducing dependence on traditional finance.
Moreover, the value foundation of stablecoins can be anchored to the consensus around Bitcoin, which means increased trust in the entire system.
**The key question now is**: Between “long-term preservation of value” and “instant liquidity,” which is more likely to attract traditional capital first? Why?