UK lawmakers jointly urge reconsideration of the stablecoin framework: beware of excessive regulation increasing the risk of capital flight

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Chain Wen】Recently, cross-party UK parliamentarians jointly wrote a letter to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, stating that the current stablecoin regulatory framework is too strict. Their core concern is straightforward: the Bank of England’s proposed framework limits the application scenarios of stablecoins in wholesale markets, bans interest on reserves, and caps individual holdings at £20,000. If this plan takes effect, the consequences could be more severe than expected. London’s status as a global financial hub may be weakened, and a large amount of capital might flow into alternative stablecoins pegged to the dollar—essentially, opportunities could be taken away by the US stablecoin ecosystem. The lawmakers’ suggestions are quite pragmatic: build a more forward-looking stablecoin framework that can attract international investment, allow high-value fintech projects to develop in the UK, and ultimately strengthen the UK’s voice in global innovation. Behind this game, it actually reflects the competition among countries for the discourse power over Web3 financial infrastructure.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MemeTokenGeniusvip
· 5h ago
This move by the UK is brilliant. Only now do they realize that the regulation is too strict. To put it simply, they are just afraid of being crushed by the US, as USDC is almost becoming the international settlement standard.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKingvip
· 12-13 09:29
It's the same old trick again; regulators will never understand how Web3 works. This move by the UK is really too stereotypical—capping at 20,000 pounds? You're just handing yourself over to the US. Capital is fluid and unstoppable; instead of restricting it, open up competition. London is probably going to be overtaken by New York this time, losing its say in the process. Regulation and innovation, this pair of rivals—when will they find a balance?
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Richvip
· 12-13 09:28
Another political strategist's empty talk, loosened regulations still lead to the same old money-grabbing UK wants to retain stablecoins? Wake up, they are already being overtaken by USDC in the US The 20,000-pound cap is really laughable; if this continues, the UK's status as a financial center is in doubt The key is that reserve funds are prohibited from accruing interest—who would want to use such a setup? Funds have long moved to the US Overregulation is just digging a hole for oneself; London is about to be overtaken by New York The framework indeed needs to change, but it seems the UK's reaction is a bit late this time At the end of the day, it's all about countries competing for the narrative in Web3; the UK needs to act quickly in this move
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 12-13 09:26
After tracking on-chain data, this move by the UK really can't compete with the US. Once the 20,000 GBP ceiling was set, retail investors were locked out, and capital concentration skyrocketed. Who benefits from this... US-based stablecoins are well fed.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTradervip
· 12-13 09:18
Britain is shooting itself in the foot by implementing a blanket ban on stablecoins. Capital has already moved to the US.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)